Ballieux R E, Heijnen C J
Immunol Rev. 1983;74:5-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1983.tb01082.x.
Until now, most of the studies on regulatory T cells have been based on culture systems in which human peripheral blood cells are stimulated by polyclonal stimulators like Pokeweed Mitogen (PWM). Our present contribution, however, deals with T cell-mediated regulation of the antigen-induced B cell activation, which exclusively leads to an antigen-specific IgM production (Heijnen et al. 1979a). Some authors' reports on regulatory activities of T cells, as tested in systems using polyclonal stimulators, differ from ours. This may be due to: a) as a result of polyclonal stimulus, various types of regulatory T cells are activated at the same time b) in contrast to a primary antigen, a polyclonal stimulator induces a rapid proliferation of the various regulatory T cells c) a polyclonal stimulator induces the differentiation of B cells in various maturational stages, that might each require additional or different regulatory signals. For example, Thomas et al. (1981) have shown that freshly isolated T4+ cells can induce suppressor activity in unprimed T8+ cells in the presence of PWM, whereas T4+ cells, precultured for 24 h in the presence of PWM, can exert a suppressor activity themselves without an apparent need for T8+ cells. In the antigen-specific system, however, we have neither been able to detect T suppressor effector activity in a population of primed T4+ cells, nor been able to demonstrate T suppressor inducer activity in unprimed T4+ cells (Heijnen et al. 1982a). Therefore the state of activation of the total T4+ population will dictate the balance of the total T helper and T suppressor activity. As a result of proliferation induced by polyclonal mitogens, small subsets of regulatory T cells, which are functionally undetectable in the primary antigen-specific assay, can expand sufficiently to have a measurable effect. Thomas et al. (1980) have shown that the T4+ suppressor inducer cell in the PWM system is radio-sensitive, which is in contrast with our data in the antigen-specific system. This may imply that we are looking at different subsets of T suppressor inducer cells in these different systems, but it might also indicate that T suppressor inducer cells need to proliferate in order to be able to measurably regulate the large pool of responding cells generated in the PWM system. Apart from such quantitative effects, polyclonal B cell activators like PWM are capable of inducing the differentiation of B cells in various maturational stages (Kuritani & Cooper 1982, Stevens 1982, Peters & Fauci 1983). Since it is highly likely that the regulation of these various B cell subsets might require different regulatory signals, the PWM model might be a very complicated model to study regulatory effects of single T cell subsets.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
到目前为止,大多数关于调节性T细胞的研究都是基于培养系统,在这些系统中,人类外周血细胞由多克隆刺激剂如商陆有丝分裂原(PWM)刺激。然而,我们目前的研究涉及T细胞介导的对抗原诱导的B细胞活化的调节,这种调节专门导致抗原特异性IgM的产生(海涅恩等人,1979a)。一些作者在使用多克隆刺激剂的系统中测试T细胞调节活性的报告与我们的不同。这可能是由于:a)作为多克隆刺激的结果,各种类型的调节性T细胞同时被激活;b)与初级抗原不同,多克隆刺激剂诱导各种调节性T细胞快速增殖;c)多克隆刺激剂诱导处于不同成熟阶段的B细胞分化,而每个阶段可能都需要额外的或不同的调节信号。例如,托马斯等人(1981年)表明,新鲜分离的T4 + 细胞在PWM存在的情况下可以诱导未致敏的T8 + 细胞产生抑制活性,而在PWM存在下预培养24小时的T4 + 细胞自身可以发挥抑制活性,显然不需要T8 + 细胞。然而,在抗原特异性系统中,我们既未能在致敏的T4 + 细胞群体中检测到T抑制效应活性,也未能在未致敏的T4 + 细胞中证明T抑制诱导活性(海涅恩等人,1982a)。因此,整个T4 + 群体的活化状态将决定总的T辅助细胞和T抑制细胞活性的平衡。由于多克隆有丝分裂原诱导的增殖,在初级抗原特异性检测中功能上无法检测到的调节性T细胞小亚群可以充分扩增以产生可测量的效应。托马斯等人(1980年)表明,PWM系统中的T4 + 抑制诱导细胞对辐射敏感,这与我们在抗原特异性系统中的数据相反。这可能意味着我们在这些不同的系统中研究的是不同的T抑制诱导细胞亚群,但也可能表明T抑制诱导细胞需要增殖才能可测量地调节PWM系统中产生的大量反应细胞。除了这种定量效应外,像PWM这样的多克隆B细胞激活剂能够诱导处于不同成熟阶段的B细胞分化(栗谷和库珀,1982年;史蒂文斯,1982年;彼得斯和福西,1983年)。由于很可能这些不同B细胞亚群的调节可能需要不同的调节信号,PWM模型可能是研究单个T细胞亚群调节作用的非常复杂的模型。(摘要截短至400字)