Bloomfield Mathew, McCormack Amanda, Mandrioli Daniele, Fiala Christian, Aldaz C Marcelo, Duesberg Peter
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Donner Laboratory, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA USA.
Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD USA.
Mol Cytogenet. 2014 Dec 16;7(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13039-014-0071-x. eCollection 2014.
A century of research has established that cancers arise from tissues exposed to carcinogens only after long latencies of years to decades and have individual clonal karyotypes. Since speciation from known precursors also depends on long latencies and new species also have individual karyotypes, we and others have recently proposed that carcinogenesis is a form of speciation. According to this theory karyotypic evolutions generate new cancer species from normal cells as follows: Carcinogens induce aneuploidy (Figure 1). By unbalancing thousands of genes aneuploidy automatically destabilizes the karyotype and thus catalyzes random karyotypic variations. Selections of variants with proliferative phenotypes form non-clonal hyperplasias with persistently varying karyotypes. Very rare karyotypic variations form new cancer species with individual clonal karyotypes. Despite destabilization by the resulting congenital aneuploidies, cancer karyotypes are stabilized within narrow margins of variation by clonal selections for cancer-specific autonomy. Because all non-cancerous aneuploidies are unstable, all aneusomies of prospective cancers are joined in single-steps, rather than gradually. Since this mechanism is very inefficient, it predicts long latent periods from carcinogens to cancers and individual clonal cancer karyotypes.
Here we have tested the predicted roles of karyotypic evolutions during the time course of carcinogenesis in an established experimental system. In this system injection of nitrosourea induces in female rats non-invasive mammary hyperplasias ("tumors") after two or more months, and invasive carcinomas after six or more months. Accordingly four specific predictions were tested: (1) Invasive cancers are late and carry individual clonal karyotypes and phenotypes, (2) Persistent hyperplasias carry non-clonal karyotypes, (3) Non-clonal hyperplasias generate clonal cancers spontaneously but rarely, (4) Cancer-karyotypes arise with all individual clonal aneusomies in single-steps. All four predictions were experimentally confirmed.
Our results along with the literature reveal a coherent karyotypic mechanism of carcinogenesis: Carcinogens induce aneuploidy. The inherent instability of aneuploidy automatically catalyzes new karyotypic variations. Aneuploid karyotypes with proliferative phenotypes form varying non-clonal hyperplasias. Rare variations form cancer species with individual clonal karyotypes, which are stabilized by clonal selection for autonomy. The low odds of this mechanism explain the long latencies of carcinogenesis, the individuality and karyotypic clonality of cancers.
一个世纪的研究已证实,癌症仅在数年至数十年的长时间潜伏期后才会从暴露于致癌物的组织中产生,并且具有个体克隆核型。由于从已知前体物种形成新物种也依赖于长时间潜伏期,且新物种也具有个体核型,我们和其他研究人员最近提出致癌作用是物种形成的一种形式。根据这一理论,核型进化从正常细胞产生新的癌症物种的过程如下:致癌物诱导非整倍体(图1)。非整倍体通过使数千个基因失衡,自动使核型不稳定,从而催化随机的核型变异。选择具有增殖表型的变异体形成核型持续变化的非克隆性增生。非常罕见的核型变异形成具有个体克隆核型的新癌症物种。尽管由此产生的先天性非整倍体会导致不稳定,但癌症核型通过对癌症特异性自主性的克隆选择在狭窄的变异范围内得以稳定。由于所有非癌性非整倍体都是不稳定的,所有潜在癌症的非整倍体都是一步形成,而非逐渐形成。由于这种机制效率非常低,它预示着从致癌物到癌症的潜伏期很长,且癌症具有个体克隆核型。
在此,我们在一个既定的实验系统中测试了核型进化在致癌过程中的预测作用。在这个系统中,给雌性大鼠注射亚硝基脲后,两个月或更长时间会诱导出非侵袭性乳腺增生(“肿瘤”),六个月或更长时间会诱导出侵袭性癌。因此,我们测试了四个具体预测:(1)侵袭性癌症出现较晚,且具有个体克隆核型和表型;(2)持续性增生具有非克隆核型;(3)非克隆性增生很少自发产生克隆性癌症;(4)癌症核型以一步形成所有个体克隆非整倍体的方式出现。所有这四个预测都通过实验得到了证实。
我们的结果以及相关文献揭示了一种连贯的致癌核型机制:致癌物诱导非整倍体。非整倍体固有的不稳定性自动催化新的核型变异。具有增殖表型的非整倍体核型形成不同的非克隆性增生。罕见的变异形成具有个体克隆核型的癌症物种,这些物种通过对自主性的克隆选择得以稳定。这种机制发生的几率低,解释了致癌作用的长时间潜伏期、癌症的个体性和核型克隆性。