Tooke J E, Ostergren J, Fagrell B
Int J Microcirc Clin Exp. 1983;2(4):277-84.
Synchronous assessments of microcirculatory flow in human skin have been made by the techniques of laser Doppler flowmetry and dynamic capillaroscopy in adjacent areas of the same nailfold. Microvascular flow was studied at rest, following release of arterial occlusion and during application of venous occlusion in seven normal subjects. Despite broad comparability in the pattern of responses recorded by the two techniques certain significant differences were observed. Vasomotor activity of a similar frequency (4 to 9 cycles per min) was recorded by both techniques, but the activity was asynchronous. The amplitude of the cyclical change in the mean resting flow value recorded by dynamic capillaroscopy was considerably greater than that recorded by laser Doppler (X +/- SD, 25.3 +/- 7.0% mean rest flow; 11.4 +/- 4.9% mean rest flow, p less than 0.01). The time to peak flow following release of a 60 s arterial occlusion was significantly longer as assessed by dynamic capillaroscopy (5.7 +/- 1.6 s: 3.3 +/- 1.0 s. p less than 0.02). In response to a venous congestion pressure of 50 mm Hg, capillary flow rate fell to 24 +/- 6% of the resting flow value as assessed by dynamic capillaroscopy over the first 30 s of occlusion. Laser Doppler flowmetry also recorded a fall in microcirculatory flow to 59 +/- 21% of resting flow value during this period, but this reduction was significantly less than that recorded by dynamic capillaroscopy (p less than 0.05). These discrepancies are interpreted as evidence that laser Doppler flowmetry records blood flow in vessels in addition to the superficial, nutritional capillaries.
在同一甲襞的相邻区域,运用激光多普勒血流仪技术和动态毛细血管显微镜技术对人体皮肤的微循环血流进行了同步评估。在7名正常受试者中,研究了静息状态、动脉闭塞解除后以及静脉闭塞应用过程中的微血管血流情况。尽管两种技术记录的反应模式具有广泛的可比性,但仍观察到某些显著差异。两种技术均记录到了频率相似(每分钟4至9个周期)的血管运动活动,但活动是不同步的。动态毛细血管显微镜记录的平均静息血流值的周期性变化幅度明显大于激光多普勒记录的幅度(X±SD,平均静息血流的25.3±7.0%;平均静息血流的11.4±4.9%,p<0.01)。通过动态毛细血管显微镜评估,60秒动脉闭塞解除后血流达到峰值的时间明显更长(5.7±1.6秒:3.3±1.0秒,p<0.02)。在50毫米汞柱的静脉充血压力作用下,通过动态毛细血管显微镜评估,在闭塞的前30秒内,毛细血管血流速度降至静息血流值的24±6%。在此期间,激光多普勒血流仪也记录到微循环血流降至静息血流值的59±21%,但这种降低明显小于动态毛细血管显微镜记录的降低幅度(p<0.05)。这些差异被解释为激光多普勒血流仪除了记录浅表营养毛细血管的血流外,还记录了血管中的血流。