• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Activity of rifampicin against staphylococci, with special reference to multiresistant strains.

作者信息

Dixson S, Brumfitt W, Hamilton-Miller J M

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984 Jun;13 Suppl C:7-16. doi: 10.1093/jac/13.suppl_c.7.

DOI:10.1093/jac/13.suppl_c.7
PMID:6236192
Abstract

Antibiotic-sensitive and multiply-resistant isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and Staph. epidermidis were all sensitive to rifampicin (MIC less than or equal to 0.015) mg/l) and to novobiocin, vancomycin and teicoplanin (MICs less than 1 mg/l). No tolerance was observed. Resistance sometimes developed in bactericidal tests on rifampicin or novobiocin alone, but not with vancomycin or teicoplanin, or with combinations. The implications of these findings are discussed in the context of serious infections with staphylococci, especially those resistant to beta-lactams and aminoglycosides.

摘要

相似文献

1
Activity of rifampicin against staphylococci, with special reference to multiresistant strains.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984 Jun;13 Suppl C:7-16. doi: 10.1093/jac/13.suppl_c.7.
2
In vitro activity of six antibiotics against multiresistant staphylococci and other gram-positive cocci.六种抗生素对多重耐药葡萄球菌及其他革兰氏阳性球菌的体外活性
Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Feb;4(1):19-23. doi: 10.1007/BF02148654.
3
Comparative in vitro activities of teichomycin and vancomycin alone and in combination with rifampin and aminoglycosides against staphylococci and enterococci.替考拉宁与万古霉素单独及联合利福平、氨基糖苷类药物对葡萄球菌和肠球菌的体外比较活性
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Apr;25(4):411-2. doi: 10.1128/AAC.25.4.411.
4
Novobiocin and rifampicin in combination against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an in-vitro comparison with vancomycin plus rifampicin.新生霉素与利福平联合用于抗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌:与万古霉素加利福平的体外比较
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1986 Jan;17(1):75-82. doi: 10.1093/jac/17.1.75.
5
Synergy study of vancomycin or teicoplanin plus gentamicin against enterococci, Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci by time-kill method.采用时间杀菌法对万古霉素或替考拉宁联合庆大霉素针对肠球菌、金黄色葡萄球菌及凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌进行协同研究。
J Med Assoc Thai. 1991 Dec;74(12):669-74.
6
In-vitro effects of vancomycin and rifampicin, alone and in combination, against methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant staphylococci.万古霉素和利福平单独及联合使用对甲氧西林敏感和耐甲氧西林葡萄球菌的体外作用
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984 Dec;14 Suppl D:35-41. doi: 10.1093/jac/14.suppl_d.35.
7
Teicoplanin, vancomycin, rifampicin: in-vivo and in-vitro studies with Staphylococcus aureus.替考拉宁、万古霉素、利福平:针对金黄色葡萄球菌的体内和体外研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1987 May;19(5):659-62. doi: 10.1093/jac/19.5.659.
8
[Activity of vancomycin, teicoplanin and linezolid in methicillin resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococci isolates from paediatric blood cultures].[万古霉素、替考拉宁和利奈唑胺对儿科血培养中耐甲氧西林凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌分离株的活性]
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2012 Mar;25(1):25-30.
9
Antibacterial activity of teicoplanin and vancomycin in combination with rifampicin, fusidic acid or fosfomycin against staphylococci on vein catheters.替考拉宁和万古霉素联合利福平、夫西地酸或磷霉素对静脉导管上葡萄球菌的抗菌活性
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1990;72:14-9.
10
Development of in-vitro resistance to glycopeptide antibiotics: assessment in staphylococci of different species.糖肽类抗生素体外耐药性的产生:不同种葡萄球菌中的评估
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991 Jan;27(1):71-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/27.1.71.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal teicoplanin in patients with chronic renal failure on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.持续非卧床腹膜透析的慢性肾衰竭患者腹腔注射替考拉宁的药代动力学
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1988 Jun;25(6):761-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1988.tb05265.x.
2
Pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.持续非卧床腹膜透析患者替考拉宁的药代动力学
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1986;31(4):501-4. doi: 10.1007/BF00613532.