Suppr超能文献

丘疹脓疱型痤疮的局部用药与全身用药治疗:一项成本效益分析

Topical v systemic agent treatment for papulopustular acne. A cost-effectiveness analysis.

作者信息

Stern R S, Pass T M, Komaroff A L

出版信息

Arch Dermatol. 1984 Dec;120(12):1571-8.

PMID:6239593
Abstract

We used cost-effectiveness analysis to compare the costs, risks, and benefits of two strategies for clearing papulopustular acne; topical therapy alone as initial therapy or a combination of systemic antibiotics and topical agents used at the first visit. Patients treated with combination therapy had fewer weeks of morbidity from acne, and lower dollar costs but have a greater risk of side effects. If the topical therapy alone was chosen to reduce the risk of side effects in a population of patients there would be an additional $764 in costs and 238 weeks of morbidity from acne to avert a single additional instance of side effects. Initial treatment of papulopustular acne with combined oral antibiotics and topical agents thus seems to be cost-effective. After clearing is achieved, maintenance therapy with topical agents should be considered.

摘要

我们采用成本效益分析来比较两种治疗丘疹脓疱性痤疮策略的成本、风险和效益;一种是仅采用局部治疗作为初始治疗,另一种是在首次就诊时采用全身用抗生素与局部用药联合治疗。接受联合治疗的患者痤疮发病周数更少,成本更低,但副作用风险更高。如果选择仅采用局部治疗来降低患者群体中的副作用风险,那么为避免多一例副作用,成本将额外增加764美元,痤疮发病周数将增加238周。因此,采用口服抗生素与局部用药联合治疗丘疹脓疱性痤疮的初始治疗似乎具有成本效益。在实现清除后,应考虑采用局部用药进行维持治疗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验