Suppr超能文献

选定的静脉输液泵和速率调节器的比较。

Comparison of selected intravenous infusion pumps and rate regulators.

作者信息

Kitrenos J G, Jones M, McLeod D C

出版信息

Am J Hosp Pharm. 1978 Mar;35(3):304-10.

PMID:626210
Abstract

Selected intravenous infusion pumps and rate regulators were compared to determine the relative advantages and disadvantages and to formulate guidelines for purchase of these devices. Three basic types of devices were studied: infusion rate regulators, nonvolumetric (peristaltic) infusion pumps and volumetric infusion pumps. Simple syringe-type infusion pumps were not studied. After use and close study of the devices, both in the laboratory and in the clinical area, desirable features were identified. Ideally, the infusion device should operate over a wide rate range, use standard administration sets, be easy to assemble and service, have an internal battery of good power for several hours, have appropriate malfunction alarms, have an automatic keep-open device in alarm situations, be accurate under a variety of situations, and be easy for the nurse to understand and operate. All devices tested were accurate within the limits claimed by the manufacturer, although a couple of models have features which can cause gross volume errors. Overall evaluation resulted in preference of some devices over others. Cost of infusion devices and administration sets can vary widely, and this should be a factor in the final choice of intravenous infusion equipment.

摘要

对选定的静脉输液泵和速率调节器进行比较,以确定其相对优缺点,并制定这些设备的采购指南。研究了三种基本类型的设备:输液速率调节器、非容量式(蠕动式)输液泵和容量式输液泵。未对简单的注射器式输液泵进行研究。在实验室和临床区域对这些设备进行使用和深入研究后,确定了理想的特性。理想情况下,输液设备应能在较宽的速率范围内运行,使用标准的给药装置,易于组装和维护,内置电池电量充足且能持续数小时,具备适当的故障警报功能,在警报情况下有自动保持开启装置,在各种情况下都准确无误,并且护士易于理解和操作。尽管有几款型号具有可能导致总体积误差的特性,但所有测试设备在制造商声称的范围内都是准确的。总体评估结果表明,某些设备比其他设备更受青睐。输液设备和给药装置的成本差异很大,这应是静脉输液设备最终选择时的一个考虑因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验