Williams G Z, Widdowson G M, Penton J
Clin Chem. 1978 Feb;24(2):313-20.
Assessment of the significance of an observed set of serum chemical values for determining a person's state of health requires comparison with a set of defined reference values. We tested the assumption that a reference group of individuals, categorized by age and sex, gives a narrower range of variation than does a larger mixed population. If this were true, the demographic set would be a more sensitive reference than is the customary "normal range" for interpretation of values occurring in the individual. The ratio, R, of intra-personal to inter-personal (group) standard deviations was similar for defined age/sex classes and the overall group for 16 serum constituents. When the "raw" intra-individual variation (biological plus analytical variation) was adjusted to remove the average analytical component, the resulting R was less than 80 for all constituents except creatine kinase, which indicates that these are all particularly strong "discriminators" of individuality. These results imply the need for individual rather than population-based reference ranges, even if the latter are from persons of similar age and the same sex.
评估一组观察到的血清化学值对于确定一个人的健康状况的意义需要与一组定义的参考值进行比较。我们检验了这样一个假设,即按年龄和性别分类的个体参考组比更大的混合人群具有更窄的变异范围。如果这是真的,那么人口统计学组将比惯常的“正常范围”更敏感,用于解释个体中出现的值。对于16种血清成分,定义的年龄/性别类别和总体组的个体内标准差与个体间(组)标准差的比值R相似。当对“原始”个体内变异(生物学变异加分析变异)进行调整以去除平均分析成分时,除肌酸激酶外,所有成分的所得R均小于80,这表明这些都是个体性的特别强的“鉴别指标”。这些结果意味着需要基于个体而非人群的参考范围,即使后者来自年龄相似和性别的人。