Pronovost A D, Baumgarten A, Andiman W A
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Aug;16(2):345-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.2.345-349.1982.
Current methods of viral diagnosis have been criticized for slowness and insensitivity. However, immunoassay may provide the desired increase in the speed of diagnosis without sacrificing accuracy. This report describes the efficacy of the detection of viral antigen by means of an absorptiometric enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) or by a chemiluminescent enzyme-linked immunoassay (CELISA). Human cytomegalovirus was detected in clinical specimens or culture fluid with comparable sensitivity by CELISA and by viral isolation but with 50 times lesser sensitivity by ELISA. Similarly, herpes simplex virus was detected in clinical specimens with markedly greater sensitivity by CELISA than by ELISA. These findings indicate that the detection of appropriate viruses by CELISA may be a practical alternative to their isolation in cell culture.
目前的病毒诊断方法因速度慢和灵敏度低而受到批评。然而,免疫测定法可能在不牺牲准确性的情况下提高诊断速度。本报告描述了通过吸收光度酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)或化学发光酶联免疫测定法(CELISA)检测病毒抗原的效果。通过CELISA和病毒分离法在临床标本或培养液中检测人巨细胞病毒,灵敏度相当,但ELISA的灵敏度要低50倍。同样,通过CELISA在临床标本中检测单纯疱疹病毒的灵敏度明显高于ELISA。这些发现表明,通过CELISA检测合适的病毒可能是在细胞培养中进行病毒分离的一种实用替代方法。