Suppr超能文献

通过细菌限制性内切酶DNA分析(BRENDA)对问号钩端螺旋体血清型哈德乔、巴尔干尼亚和塔拉索维内的亚型进行鉴别。

Differentiation of subtypes within Leptospira interrogans serovars Hardjo, Balcanica and Tarassovi, by bacterial restriction-endonuclease DNA analysis (BRENDA).

作者信息

Robinson A J, Ramadass P, Lee A, Marshall R B

出版信息

J Med Microbiol. 1982 Aug;15(3):331-8. doi: 10.1099/00222615-15-3-331.

Abstract

Various strains of Leptospira interrogans were compared by bacterial restriction-endonuclease DNA analysis (BRENDA). Field strains of serovar hardjo isolated from domestic animals in New Zealand, Australia and Northern Ireland were indistinguishable from one another but differed strikingly from the hardjo reference strain Hardjoprajitno. Similarly, field isolates of balcanica and tarassovi differed from their serovar reference strains, probably owing to a difference in epidemiological niche. Subdivision of these serovars into distinct subtypes as defined by BRENDA is therefore useful and justified. In contrast, analysis of serovars pomona, ballum and copenhageni shows that field and reference strains were identical, or differed only by a single band. It is suggested that BRENDA will overcome many of the problems associated with serological methods of identifying serovars and allow more precise definition of epidemiological relationships between strains and their hosts.

摘要

通过细菌限制性内切酶DNA分析(BRENDA)对问号钩端螺旋体的各种菌株进行了比较。从新西兰、澳大利亚和北爱尔兰的家畜中分离出的血清型哈德焦田间菌株彼此无法区分,但与哈德焦参考菌株哈德焦普拉吉特诺有显著差异。同样,巴尔干尼卡和塔拉索维田间分离株与其血清型参考菌株不同,这可能是由于流行病学生态位的差异。因此,按照BRENDA定义将这些血清型细分为不同的亚型是有用且合理的。相比之下,对波摩那、巴鲁姆和哥本哈根血清型的分析表明,田间菌株和参考菌株是相同的,或者仅相差一条带。有人认为,BRENDA将克服与血清学方法鉴定血清型相关的许多问题,并能更精确地定义菌株与其宿主之间的流行病学关系。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验