Nikaido H, Rosenberg E Y
J Bacteriol. 1983 Jan;153(1):241-52. doi: 10.1128/jb.153.1.241-252.1983.
Rates of diffusion of uncharged and charged solute molecules through porin channels were determined by using liposomes reconstituted from egg phosphatidylcholine and purified Escherichia coli porins OmpF (protein 1a), OmpC (protein 1b), and PhoE (protein E). All three porin proteins appeared to produce channels of similar size, although the OmpF channel appeared to be 7 to 9% larger than the OmpC and PhoE channels in an equivalent radius. Hydrophobicity of the solute retarded the penetration through all three channels in a similar manner. The presence of one negative charge on the solute resulted in about a threefold reduction in penetration rates through OmpF and OmpC channels, whereas it produced two- to tenfold acceleration of diffusion through the PhoE channel. The addition of the second negatively charged group to the solutes decreased the diffusion rates through OmpF and OmpC channels further, whereas diffusion through the PhoE channel was not affected much. These results suggest that PhoE specializes in the uptake of negatively charged solutes. At the present level of resolution, no sign of true solute specificity was found in OmpF and OmpC channels; peptides, for example, diffused through both of these channels at rates expected from their molecular size, hydrophobicity, and charge. However, the OmpF porin channel allowed influx of more solute molecules per unit time than did the equivalent weight of the OmpC porin when the flux was driven by a concentration gradient of the same size. This apparent difference in "efficiency" became more pronounced with larger solutes, and it is likely to be the consequence of the difference in the sizes of OmpF and OmpC channels.
通过使用由鸡蛋磷脂酰胆碱和纯化的大肠杆菌孔蛋白OmpF(蛋白1a)、OmpC(蛋白1b)和PhoE(蛋白E)重构的脂质体,测定了不带电和带电溶质分子通过孔蛋白通道的扩散速率。尽管在等效半径下,OmpF通道似乎比OmpC和PhoE通道大7%至9%,但所有这三种孔蛋白似乎都产生了大小相似的通道。溶质的疏水性以类似的方式阻碍了其通过所有这三种通道的渗透。溶质上存在一个负电荷导致通过OmpF和OmpC通道的渗透速率降低约三倍,而通过PhoE通道的扩散速率则加快了两倍至十倍。向溶质中添加第二个带负电荷的基团进一步降低了通过OmpF和OmpC通道的扩散速率,而通过PhoE通道的扩散则受影响不大。这些结果表明,PhoE专门负责摄取带负电荷的溶质。在目前的分辨率水平下,在OmpF和OmpC通道中未发现真正的溶质特异性迹象;例如,肽以与其分子大小、疏水性和电荷预期相符的速率通过这两种通道扩散。然而,当通量由相同大小的浓度梯度驱动时,与相同重量的OmpC孔蛋白相比,OmpF孔蛋白通道每单位时间允许更多的溶质分子流入。随着溶质变大,这种明显的“效率”差异变得更加明显,这可能是OmpF和OmpC通道大小不同的结果。