Lewis S M, D'Argenio D Z, Bekey G A, Mittman C
Respir Physiol. 1982 Oct;50(1):111-27. doi: 10.1016/0034-5687(82)90011-1.
The nitrogen washout test will yield more information about the distribution of pulmonary ventilation if a pattern of inspired gas concentrations is utilized other than the standard series of 100% oxygen breaths. The input breathing pattern which yields optimal results will vary with the specific features of the lung being studied but typically includes breaths of air, particularly in the last third of the washout. Using computerized, mathematical techniques, optimal inputs were selected for washout tests of duration 10, 20, 30 and 40 breaths for each of six lung models, ranging from a unicompartmental to a highly non-uniform 'diseased' lung. Knowing these optimal inputs we were able to devise a nominal input which was similar to the optimal inputs for all models. For a 10 breath test this nominal input pattern utilized a breath of air at breath 7. For a 20 breath test, air is utilized at breaths 12, 14, 15, 19; for 30, air at 19, 21, 22, 23, 29 and for a 40-breath test, air at breaths 19, 24, 28, 30, 31, 32 and 39. The 30-breath nominal sequence was compared with the conventional oxygen-only washout and a 31-breath pseudo-random binary (PRB) input. Comparisons were made using computer simulated washouts as well as actual tests on human subjects. The 30-breath nominal input was always superior to the standard washout and was superior to the PRB input for all models except the lung ventilated with vital capacity breaths. We conclude that a significant advantage is gained by substituting the recommended sequences of breaths in studies of the dynamics of gas exchange in the lung.
如果采用不同于标准的一系列100%氧气呼吸的吸入气体浓度模式,氮洗脱试验将产生更多关于肺通气分布的信息。能产生最佳结果的输入呼吸模式会因所研究肺部的具体特征而有所不同,但通常包括空气呼吸,特别是在洗脱的最后三分之一阶段。使用计算机化的数学技术,为六个肺模型(从单室模型到高度不均匀的“患病”肺模型)中的每一个,在10次、20次、30次和40次呼吸时长的洗脱试验中选择了最佳输入。了解这些最佳输入后,我们能够设计出一种标称输入,它与所有模型的最佳输入相似。对于10次呼吸的试验,这种标称输入模式在第7次呼吸时使用空气呼吸。对于20次呼吸的试验,在第12次、14次、15次、19次呼吸时使用空气;对于30次呼吸的试验,在第19次、21次、22次、23次、29次呼吸时使用空气;对于40次呼吸的试验,在第19次、24次、28次、30次、31次、32次和39次呼吸时使用空气。将30次呼吸的标称序列与传统的仅用氧气的洗脱以及31次呼吸的伪随机二进制(PRB)输入进行比较。使用计算机模拟洗脱以及对人体受试者的实际测试进行比较。30次呼吸的标称输入在所有模型中总是优于标准洗脱,并且除了以肺活量呼吸进行通气的肺模型外,在所有模型中都优于PRB输入。我们得出结论,在肺部气体交换动力学研究中,用推荐的呼吸序列替代能带来显著优势。