Senay L C
J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1978 Feb;44(2):166-70. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1978.44.2.166.
Twelve men block-stepped (35 W) 4 h/day for 12 days and were divided into two similar groups on the basis of Vo2max. All were exposed to 33.8 degrees C dry bulb, 32.7 degrees C wet bulb for 2 h (E1) while working (30% Vo2max). Venous blood was obtained at 10-min intervals during hour 1 and at 20-min intervals during hour 2. Group 1 was acclimatized to heat. Group II continued to train. The test exposure was repeated (E2). During E1 a trend toward hemodilution was evident but not significant for either group. Protein moved into the vascular volume and a decrease in plasma osmolarity was significant only after 30 min. For both groups during E2 significant hemodilution occurred during the first 10 min. Only group I remained significantly hemodiluted for 2 h. Protein movement and osmodilution again occurred in both groups. These results support earlier suggestions as to the mechanisms of hemodilution based on 1-h blood samples. Conflicting evidence as to the pressure or absence of hemodilution upon heat exposure is noted, and a hypothesis is proposed which appears to reconcile divergent results.
12名男性以35瓦功率进行间歇式阶梯训练,每天训练4小时,共训练12天,然后根据最大摄氧量被分为两个相似的组。所有人在工作时(最大摄氧量的30%)暴露于干球温度33.8摄氏度、湿球温度32.7摄氏度的环境中2小时(E1)。在第1小时内每隔10分钟采集静脉血,在第2小时内每隔20分钟采集静脉血。第1组进行热适应。第2组继续训练。重复测试暴露(E2)。在E1期间,两组均出现血液稀释趋势,但不显著。蛋白质进入血管容量,仅在30分钟后血浆渗透压降低显著。在E2期间,两组在前10分钟均出现显著血液稀释。只有第1组在2小时内仍保持显著血液稀释。两组再次出现蛋白质移动和渗透压稀释。这些结果支持了基于1小时血样对血液稀释机制的早期推测。文中指出了关于热暴露时血液稀释是否存在的相互矛盾的证据,并提出了一个似乎能调和不同结果的假说。