Suppr超能文献

正式和非正式课堂环境:对多动的影响。

Formal and informal classroom settings: effects on hyperactivity.

作者信息

Jacob R G, O'Leary K D, Rosenblad C

出版信息

J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1978 Mar;6(1):47-59. doi: 10.1007/BF00915781.

Abstract

The behavior of hyperactive children was compared to controls in two different classroom settings. One setting (Informal) involved choice and variety of tasks; the other setting (Formal) involved teacher specification of a small number of tasks. As assessed by a composite observational measure of hyperactivity, there were significant differences between the hyperactive and control groups in the Formal but not in the Informal setting. Analyses of five individual categories of hyperactive behavior showed that, with one exception, the hyperactive group tended to display higher frequencies of behavior than did controls in both settings. For two of the categories, the difference between the groups was significantly larger in the Formal than in the Informal setting. Finally, a modified observational code was suggested that differentiated hyperactives from controls equally in the two settings.

摘要

在两种不同的课堂环境中,对多动症儿童的行为与对照组进行了比较。一种环境(非正式)涉及任务的选择和多样性;另一种环境(正式)涉及教师指定少量任务。通过对多动症的综合观察指标评估发现,在正式环境中多动症组与对照组之间存在显著差异,而在非正式环境中则不存在。对多动症行为的五个单独类别进行分析表明,除了一个例外,在两种环境中,多动症组的行为频率往往都高于对照组。对于其中两个类别,两组之间的差异在正式环境中比在非正式环境中显著更大。最后,提出了一种改进的观察编码,在两种环境中都能同样区分多动症儿童和对照组。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验