Grossgebauer K
Biosystems. 1983;16(3-4):253-8. doi: 10.1016/0303-2647(83)90008-4.
We have consistently tried to present our "procaryote-hypothesis" of oncogenesis in the light of evolution. It is suggested that the replication units are the essential starting points of oncogenesis, and cancer is the result of a short and compact re-evolution from eucaryotic to procaryotic replicons. In our view, the process of re-evolution or reactivation of procaryotic replication units and/or their precursors starts with the activity of a cancerogen and proceeds by genetic rearrangements, possibly by genetic transposition. Consequently, some remarks had to be made on: (a) the evolution of self-replicative species; (b) the evolvement of procaryotes to eucaryotes; and (c) the various mobile repeated genetic elements. Moreover, we have taken into consideration the important fact that most of the mammalian genome is reversibly repressed and "that there is in these modern genes still a memory of ancient sequences" ( Eigen et al., 1981). We can only speculate on the extent of the evolutionary conservation, particularly of certain ancient nucleotide sequences related to autonomous, indefinite self-replication. Nevertheless, no real argument can be made against the simple possibility that a re-evolution of eucaryotic to procaryotic replicons lead to cancer.
我们一直试图从进化的角度阐述我们关于肿瘤发生的“原核生物假说”。有人认为,复制单位是肿瘤发生的基本起始点,癌症是真核复制子向原核复制子进行短暂而紧凑的重新进化的结果。我们认为,原核复制单位及其前体的重新进化或重新激活过程始于致癌物的作用,并通过基因重排,可能是通过基因转座来进行。因此,必须对以下几个方面进行一些说明:(a) 自我复制物种的进化;(b) 原核生物向真核生物的进化;以及 (c) 各种可移动的重复遗传元件。此外,我们考虑到了一个重要事实,即大多数哺乳动物基因组是可逆抑制的,并且“在这些现代基因中仍然保留着古代序列的记忆”(艾根等人,1981年)。我们只能推测进化保守的程度,特别是与自主、无限自我复制相关的某些古代核苷酸序列的保守程度。然而,对于真核复制子向原核复制子的重新进化导致癌症这一简单可能性,并没有真正的反对理由。