• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

衡量婚姻挤压的紧密程度。

Measuring the tightness of a marriage squeeze.

作者信息

Schoen R

出版信息

Demography. 1983 Feb;20(1):61-78.

PMID:6339283
Abstract

The "marriage squeeze," or the effect on marriage of an imbalance between the numbers of males and females, has been seen as having a great influence on contemporary marriage behavior. Nonetheless, the literature does not contain a clear definition of exactly what a marriage squeeze is and contains few quantitative estimates of its impact on marriage. The present article provides a precise definition of the marriage squeeze in equation (2), and applies it to measure both artificially produced marriage squeezes in two-sex nuptiality stable populations and the experience of the United States during the period 1950-1990. The marriage squeeze is shown to be capable of producing significant changes in both the level and distribution of marriage, and it appears to be having such an impact in some contemporary Third World societies. For developed countries in general and for the United States in particular, the marriage squeeze exerts little influence on the level of marriage but has a considerable effect on the distribution of marriages. The U.S. age-sex composition of the year 1978, compared to that of the year 1951, is shown to imply a 0.54 year decrease in the male mean age at marriage and a 0.53 year increase in the female mean age at marriage, as well as an 18 percent reduction in the variance of the male ages at marriage and a 33 percent increase in the variance of the female ages. The social and economic implications of such changes have yet to be fully explored.

摘要

“婚姻挤压”,即男性与女性数量失衡对婚姻产生的影响,被视为对当代婚姻行为有重大影响。尽管如此,文献中并未对婚姻挤压的确切定义给出明确界定,且对其对婚姻影响的定量估计也很少。本文在公式(2)中给出了婚姻挤压的精确界定,并将其应用于衡量两性婚姻稳定人口中人为制造的婚姻挤压以及美国1950 - 1990年期间的实际情况。研究表明,婚姻挤压能够在婚姻水平和分布上产生显著变化,而且在一些当代第三世界社会似乎正产生这样的影响。总体而言,对于发达国家尤其是美国,婚姻挤压对婚姻水平影响不大,但对婚姻分布有相当大的影响。与1951年相比,1978年美国的年龄性别构成显示,男性平均结婚年龄下降了0.54岁,女性平均结婚年龄上升了0.53岁,同时男性结婚年龄的方差减少了18%,女性结婚年龄的方差增加了33%。这些变化的社会和经济影响还有待充分探讨。

相似文献

1
Measuring the tightness of a marriage squeeze.衡量婚姻挤压的紧密程度。
Demography. 1983 Feb;20(1):61-78.
2
The harmonic mean as the basis of a realistic two-sex marriage model.作为现实两性婚姻模型基础的调和平均数。
Demography. 1981 May;18(2):201-16.
3
Delayed marriages in Pakistan.巴基斯坦的晚婚现象。
Pak Dev Rev. 1986 Winter;25(4):535-50.
4
Daughter neglect, women's work, and marriage: Pakistan and Bangladesh compared.女儿受忽视、女性的工作与婚姻:巴基斯坦与孟加拉国之比较
Med Anthropol. 1984 Spring;8(2):109-26. doi: 10.1080/01459740.1984.9965895.
5
The "real" marriage squeeze: mate selection, mortality, and the mating gradient.“真正的”婚姻挤压:择偶、死亡率与婚姻梯度
Sociol Perspect. 1988 Apr;31(2):169-89.
6
The social impact of AIDS in Sub-Saharan Africa.艾滋病在撒哈拉以南非洲地区的社会影响。
Milbank Q. 1990;68 Suppl 1:10-32.
7
Skewed sex ratios at birth and future marriage squeeze in China and India, 2005-2100.出生性别比偏斜与未来婚龄挤压:中国和印度,2005-2100 年。
Demography. 2012 Feb;49(1):77-100. doi: 10.1007/s13524-011-0083-7.
8
Marriage Squeeze, Never-Married Proportion, and Mean Age at First Marriage in China.中国的婚姻挤压、未婚比例及初婚平均年龄
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2014;33(2):189-204. doi: 10.1007/s11113-013-9283-8. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
9
Fertility transition in a New England commercial center: Nantucket, Massachusetts, 1680-1840.新英格兰商业中心的生育转变:马萨诸塞州楠塔基特岛,1680 - 1840年
J Interdiscip Hist. 1982;13(1):17-40.
10
[The impact on nuptiality of unbalanced sex distribution in the marriage market. Interpretation problems].[婚姻市场中性别分布失衡对结婚率的影响。解释问题]
Cah Que Demogr. 1988 Autumn;17(2):175-92.

引用本文的文献

1
Love is Elsewhere: Internal Migration and Marriage Prospects in China.爱在别处:中国的国内人口迁移与婚姻前景
Eur J Popul. 2023 Mar 2;39(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s10680-023-09658-3.
2
Mating Market and Dynamics of Union Formation.婚姻市场与婚姻形成的动态变化
Eur J Popul. 2021 Sep 21;37(4-5):851-876. doi: 10.1007/s10680-021-09592-2. eCollection 2021 Nov.
3
Multigenerational Social Mobility: A Demographic Approach.多代社会流动:一种人口学方法。

本文引用的文献

1
On measuring the marriage squeeze.衡量婚姻挤压。
Demography. 1967 Jun;4(2):907-24. doi: 10.2307/2060328.
2
The marriage squeeze.婚姻挤压
Demography. 1974 May;11(2):291-9. doi: 10.2307/2060564.
3
The harmonic mean as the basis of a realistic two-sex marriage model.作为现实两性婚姻模型基础的调和平均数。
Sociol Methodol. 2021 Feb;51(1):1-43. doi: 10.1177/0081175020973054. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
4
Assimilation and ethnic marriage squeeze in early 20 century America: A gender perspective.20世纪初美国的同化与族裔婚姻困境:性别视角
Demogr Res. 2020 Jan-Jun;42:99-132. doi: 10.4054/demres.2020.42.4. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
5
Marriage Decline in Korea: Changing Composition of the Domestic Marriage Market and Growth in International Marriage.韩国婚姻 decline(下降):国内婚姻市场构成变化与国际婚姻增长
Demography. 2020 Feb;57(1):171-194. doi: 10.1007/s13524-019-00844-9.
6
Selection in two-sex stage-structured populations: Genetics, demography, and polymorphism.两性阶段结构种群中的选择:遗传学、种群统计学与多态性
Theor Popul Biol. 2019 Dec;130:160-169. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2019.07.012. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
7
The Reversed Gender Gap in Education and Assortative Mating in Europe.欧洲教育领域中性别差距的逆转与婚姻匹配
Eur J Popul. 2017 Feb 16;33(4):445-474. doi: 10.1007/s10680-016-9407-z. eCollection 2017 Oct.
8
How do sex ratios in China influence marriage decisions and intra-household resource allocation?中国的性别比例如何影响婚姻决策和家庭内部资源分配?
Rev Econ Househ. 2016 Jun;14(2):337-371. doi: 10.1007/s11150-014-9262-9. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
9
The potential pitfalls of studying adult sex ratios at aggregate levels in humans.在总体层面研究人类成年性别比的潜在陷阱。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Sep 19;372(1729). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0317.
10
China's marriage squeeze: A decomposition into age and sex structure.中国的婚姻挤压:按年龄和性别结构进行的分解
Soc Indic Res. 2016 Jun;127(2):793-807. doi: 10.1007/s11205-015-0981-y. Epub 2015 May 24.
Demography. 1981 May;18(2):201-16.
4
A two-sex nuptiality-mortality life table.两性婚姻-死亡率生命表。
Demography. 1977 Aug;14(3):333-50.