Barnett A, Berkowitz R L, Mills R, Vistnes L M
Am J Surg. 1983 Mar;145(3):379-81. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(83)90206-4.
SAM and fine mesh gauze dressings were compared on 60 consecutive skin graft donor sites. SAM dressings are significantly better than fine mesh gauze dressings for healing of split-thickness skin graft donor sites; healing occurs much more rapidly with much less pain. In patients known to be colonized with Pseudomonas, care should be taken when using SAM dressings, although it is not an absolute contraindication. There were no clinically significant differences between Tegaderm and Op-Site.
对连续60个皮肤移植供区比较了SAM敷料和细网眼纱布敷料。对于中厚皮片移植供区的愈合，SAM敷料明显优于细网眼纱布敷料；愈合速度更快，疼痛也少得多。在已知感染铜绿假单胞菌的患者中，使用SAM敷料时应谨慎，尽管这并非绝对禁忌。泰德 Derm（Tegaderm）和 Op-Site 之间没有临床显著差异。
