Suppr超能文献

用于中厚皮片供皮区的合成粘性透湿敷料与细网纱布敷料的比较。

Comparison of synthetic adhesive moisture vapor permeable and fine mesh gauze dressings for split-thickness skin graft donor sites.

作者信息

Barnett A, Berkowitz R L, Mills R, Vistnes L M

出版信息

Am J Surg. 1983 Mar;145(3):379-81. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(83)90206-4.

Abstract

SAM and fine mesh gauze dressings were compared on 60 consecutive skin graft donor sites. SAM dressings are significantly better than fine mesh gauze dressings for healing of split-thickness skin graft donor sites; healing occurs much more rapidly with much less pain. In patients known to be colonized with Pseudomonas, care should be taken when using SAM dressings, although it is not an absolute contraindication. There were no clinically significant differences between Tegaderm and Op-Site.

摘要

对连续60个皮肤移植供区比较了SAM敷料和细网眼纱布敷料。对于中厚皮片移植供区的愈合,SAM敷料明显优于细网眼纱布敷料;愈合速度更快,疼痛也少得多。在已知感染铜绿假单胞菌的患者中,使用SAM敷料时应谨慎,尽管这并非绝对禁忌。泰德 Derm(Tegaderm)和 Op-Site 之间没有临床显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验