Suppr超能文献

使用传统呼吸机进行高频正压通气。

The use of conventional ventilators for high frequency positive pressure ventilation.

作者信息

Abu-Dbai J, Flatau E, Lev A, Kohn D, Monis-Hass I, Barzilay E

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1983 May;11(5):356-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198305000-00007.

Abstract

Ten randomly selected patients were ventilated for defined periods with 2 ventilatory modes: (a) high frequency positive pressure ventilation (HFPPV) (frequency 66-70 min; tidal volume 1-3 ml/kg body weight), (b) conventional IPPV (frequency 16/min; tidal volume (VT) 10-15 ml/kg). This was done successfully using conventional ventilators, and keeping other variables (FIO2, PEEP) constant. Various ventilatory and hemodynamic variables were measured and compared during both modes of ventilation. The most prominent finding was a considerable reduction of cardiac output (CO) and stroke volume (SV) during intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) compared with HFPPV. Peak tracheal pressure was significantly lower during HFPPV. An increase in mean systemic arterial pressure and in oxygen transport was observed during HFPPV, whereas transpulmonary shunt and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) decreased during HFPPV. These findings are in accordance with previously reported advantages of HFPPV, and might be of importance in the treatment of patients with bronchopleural fistula, adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), left ventricular failure and other conditions in which conventional positive pressure ventilation (PPV) fails.

摘要

随机选择10例患者,分别采用两种通气模式进行特定时长的通气:(a)高频正压通气(HFPPV)(频率66 - 70次/分钟;潮气量1 - 3 ml/千克体重),(b)传统间歇正压通气(IPPV)(频率16次/分钟;潮气量(VT)10 - 15 ml/千克)。使用传统呼吸机成功完成此项操作,并保持其他变量(FIO2、PEEP)恒定。在两种通气模式下测量并比较了各种通气和血流动力学变量。最显著的发现是,与HFPPV相比,间歇正压通气(IPPV)期间心输出量(CO)和每搏输出量(SV)显著降低。HFPPV期间气管峰压显著更低。HFPPV期间观察到平均体循环动脉压和氧输送增加,而HFPPV期间肺内分流和肺血管阻力(PVR)降低。这些发现与先前报道的HFPPV的优势一致,可能对支气管胸膜瘘、成人呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)、左心室衰竭以及其他传统正压通气(PPV)无效的疾病患者的治疗具有重要意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验