Bunde B, Deckers Y, Dequeker J
Curr Med Res Opin. 1983;8(5):310-4. doi: 10.1185/03007998309112389.
Forty patients with definite or classical rheumatoid arthritis were entered for 3 months in a double-blind trial, 20 patients on 400 mg fentiazac or 200 mg sulindac daily. Statistically significant improvements on fentiazac were reported during the course of the study for 3 of 7 parameters: pain score, total joint score and number of swollen joints, while for sulindac a significant improvement was reported for 6 parameters: pain score, grip strength, joint size, total joint score, number of swollen joints and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Side-effects were reported during the 3-month comparative period for 3 patients receiving fentiazac, consisting of rash, headache, epigastric pain, and for 1 patient receiving sulindac who suffered from gastro-intestinal intolerance. Because of ineffectiveness and/or side-effects, the treatment had to be discontinued for 5 patients in the fentiazac group and for 3 in the sulindac treatment group. The results support earlier evidence that fentiazac and sulindac have analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties controlling disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis, sulindac being the more effective. During a long-term tolerance study, 3 of 33 patients continued on fentiazac developed a reversible hepatotoxicity possibly due to the drug.
40例确诊或典型类风湿性关节炎患者进入一项为期3个月的双盲试验,20例患者每日服用400毫克芬替酸或200毫克舒林酸。在研究过程中,芬替酸在7项指标中的3项上有统计学显著改善:疼痛评分、总关节评分和肿胀关节数;而舒林酸在6项指标上有显著改善:疼痛评分、握力、关节大小、总关节评分、肿胀关节数和红细胞沉降率。在3个月的对比期内,3例服用芬替酸的患者出现副作用,包括皮疹、头痛、上腹部疼痛;1例服用舒林酸的患者出现胃肠道不耐受。由于无效和/或副作用,芬替酸组有5例患者、舒林酸治疗组有3例患者不得不停止治疗。这些结果支持了早期证据,即芬替酸和舒林酸具有镇痛和抗炎特性,可控制类风湿性关节炎的疾病活动,舒林酸更有效。在一项长期耐受性研究中,33例继续服用芬替酸的患者中有3例出现了可能由该药物引起的可逆性肝毒性。