Simoons-Smit A M, Verweij-van Vught A M, Kanis I Y, Maclaren D M
J Hyg (Lond). 1983 Jun;90(3):461-73. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400029107.
Epidemiological analysis of Klebsiella strains from nosocomial infections needs a simple, stable and reproducible technique of typing. We have evaluated three bacteriocin typing methods for Klebsiella spp. by means of 15 bacteriocin-producing strains, with special reference to stability and reproducibility. With the three methods indicator strains and clinical strains were retyped on different days under constant test procedures. Stability of bacteriocins was tested by titration immediately after preparation and after 4 weeks of storage at -70 degrees C. Thereafter, reproducibility of typing was tested by means of these freshly prepared bacteriocin lysates and of portions of the same lysates stored at -70 degrees C. A moderate reproducibility was obtained with one method after two typing experiments: 79.2% and 61.3% for indicator strains and clinical strains respectively. The other two methods gave a much lower reproducibility of 38.5% and 32.5% for indicator strains and of 11.1% and 25.5% for clinical strains after two experiments. The reproducibility decreased after retyping three, four or five times. These methods are simple to perform but their usefulness for epidemiological studies is doubtful. Possible causes of the lack of reproducibility of the methods are discussed.
对医院感染的克雷伯菌菌株进行流行病学分析需要一种简单、稳定且可重复的分型技术。我们通过15株产细菌素的菌株评估了三种用于克雷伯菌属的细菌素分型方法,特别关注其稳定性和可重复性。使用这三种方法,在恒定的测试程序下,指示菌株和临床菌株在不同日期进行重新分型。通过在制备后立即滴定以及在-70℃储存4周后滴定来测试细菌素的稳定性。此后,通过这些新制备的细菌素裂解物以及储存在-70℃的相同裂解物的部分来测试分型的可重复性。在两次分型实验后,一种方法获得了中等程度的可重复性:指示菌株和临床菌株的可重复性分别为79.2%和61.3%。另外两种方法在两次实验后,指示菌株的可重复性低得多,分别为38.5%和32.5%,临床菌株的可重复性分别为11.1%和25.5%。在进行三次、四次或五次重新分型后,可重复性下降。这些方法操作简单,但它们在流行病学研究中的实用性值得怀疑。讨论了这些方法缺乏可重复性的可能原因。