Karlin R M, Marks C
Am J Surg. 1983 Aug;146(2):225-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(83)90378-1.
Fifty patients were treated for extracranial carotid artery trauma during the period from 1954 through 1981. The overall mortality rate was 20 percent. Primary repair was achieved in 38 patients (76 percent) with a mortality of 7.8 percent, and ligation was performed in six patients (12 percent) with a 50 percent mortality. The left carotid system was injured more frequently than the right; hemorrhage from an isolated carotid injury was readily controlled by digital pressure. Associated injuries affected the prognosis adversely. Significant neurologic deficits were present in 12 patients on first admission but the presence of neurologic deficit or coma did not serve as a contraindication to arterial repair and restoration of cerebrovascular continuity. Arteriography was not utilized once the clinical diagnosis of carotid arterial injury was made, but it was utilized when the proximity of the cervical injury provided the only suggestive evidence that vascular damage may have occurred. The presence of significant shock, coma, or neurologic deficit represent adverse prognostic features but do not contraindicate carotid repair. Profuse bleeding from a carotid injury or the presence of severe posthemorrhagic shock require urgent surgery. If control of bleeding is difficult to achieve, then ligation is preferred to suture repair.
1954年至1981年期间,50例患者接受了颅外颈动脉创伤治疗。总体死亡率为20%。38例患者(76%)成功进行了一期修复,死亡率为7.8%;6例患者(12%)进行了结扎,死亡率为50%。左颈动脉系统受伤比右颈动脉系统更频繁;单纯颈动脉损伤引起的出血通过指压很容易得到控制。合并伤对预后有不利影响。12例患者首次入院时存在明显的神经功能缺损,但神经功能缺损或昏迷的存在并非动脉修复和恢复脑血管连续性的禁忌证。一旦做出颈动脉损伤的临床诊断,就不再使用动脉造影,但当颈部损伤的部位是血管损伤可能发生的唯一提示证据时,则使用动脉造影。严重休克、昏迷或神经功能缺损的存在代表不良预后特征,但并非颈动脉修复的禁忌证。颈动脉损伤引起的大量出血或严重出血性休克的存在需要紧急手术。如果难以控制出血,那么结扎比缝合修复更可取。