Teehan E P, Padberg F T, Thompson P N, Lee B C, Silva M, Jamil Z, Swan K G, Hobson R W
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Jersey Medical School, and University Hospital, Department of Surgery, Newark 07103, USA.
Cardiovasc Surg. 1997 Apr;5(2):196-200. doi: 10.1016/s0967-2109(97)82472-6.
Management of carotid arterial injuries associated with focal neurological deficit or altered state of consciousness (SCON) remains unresolved. Experience with these injuries in one particular hospital was reviewed and the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) utilized to assist with clinical stratification of these patients. A literature review was also conducted to better define indications for repair or ligation of carotid injuries. From 1978 to 1990, 34 patients with carotid arterial injuries were reviewed with reference to the GCS, focal deficit, hypotension, anatomic site and mechanism of injury. The literature from 1952 to 1993 was surveyed for carotid artery injuries (1316 patients). Outcome of treatment with or without repair was compared with pre-operative neurologic status. Thirty-four patients with injuries of the common (24) or internal (10) carotid arteries were managed with repair (68%), ligation (24%) or observation (9%). The SCON was normal in 18 patients; 16 patients (88%) underwent repair and all remained normal. All patients with GCS 9-14 regained a normal SCON after surgical repair, while 10 patients with GCS < 8 had repair (5), ligation (3), and non-operative management (2); five returned to normal, four died and one remained comatose. However, outcomes correlated poorly with management. Of 1316 patients cited in the surgical literature, patients with no deficit and patients with pre-operative deficits did significantly better after repair as compared with ligation (P<0.001). In comatose patients, management did not affect outcome. It is concluded that carotid arterial injuries should be repaired in patients with normal neurologic evaluation, focal pre-operative neurologic deficits and in patients with GCS > 9. Comatose patients with GCS < 8 do poorly regardless of management. The GCS provides an objective for stratification of patients with altered SCON who benefit from repair of carotid arterial injuries.
伴有局灶性神经功能缺损或意识状态改变(SCON)的颈动脉损伤的处理仍未解决。回顾了某一特定医院处理这些损伤的经验,并采用格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)来协助对这些患者进行临床分层。还进行了文献综述,以更好地界定颈动脉损伤修复或结扎的指征。1978年至1990年,参照GCS、局灶性缺损、低血压、损伤的解剖部位和机制,对34例颈动脉损伤患者进行了回顾。对1952年至1993年的文献中关于颈动脉损伤(1316例患者)进行了调查。比较了有无修复治疗的结果与术前神经状态。34例颈总动脉(24例)或颈内动脉(10例)损伤患者接受了修复(68%)、结扎(24%)或观察(9%)治疗。18例患者的SCON正常;16例患者(88%)接受了修复,且均保持正常。所有GCS评分为9 - 14分的患者在手术修复后SCON恢复正常,而10例GCS评分< 8分的患者接受了修复(5例)、结扎(3例)和非手术治疗(2例);5例恢复正常,4例死亡,1例仍昏迷。然而,结果与治疗方式的相关性较差。在外科文献中引用的1316例患者中,与结扎相比,无缺损患者和术前有缺损患者在修复后情况明显更好(P<0.001)。在昏迷患者中,治疗方式不影响结果。结论是,神经评估正常、术前有局灶性神经功能缺损以及GCS评分> 9分的患者的颈动脉损伤应进行修复。GCS评分< 8分的昏迷患者无论采用何种治疗方式预后都较差。GCS为受益于颈动脉损伤修复的SCON改变患者的分层提供了一个客观指标。