• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《帝国公告》1931年版:纽伦堡审判前德国关于新疗法和人体实验的规定。

Reichsrundschreiben 1931: pre-Nuremberg German regulations concerning new therapy and human experimentation.

作者信息

Sass H M

出版信息

J Med Philos. 1983 May;8(2):99-111. doi: 10.1093/jmp/8.2.99.

DOI:10.1093/jmp/8.2.99
PMID:6350522
Abstract

This is the first re-publication and first English translation of regulations concerning Human Experimentation which were binding law prior to and during the Third Reich, 1931 to 1945. The introduction briefly describes the duties of the Reichsgesundheitsamt, which formulated these regulations. It then outlines the basic concept of the Richtlinien for protecting subjects and patients on the one hand and for encouraging New Therapy and Human Experimentation on the other hand. Major issues, like personal responsibility of the physician or researcher, teaching of ethics of research and therapy, and research and therapy on vulnerable populations, are compared with the regulations in the Nuremberg Code and subsequent regulations influenced by the Nuremberg Code.

摘要

这是关于人体实验的法规的首次重新出版及首次英文翻译,这些法规在1931年至1945年第三帝国时期及之前是具有约束力的法律。引言简要描述了制定这些法规的帝国卫生部的职责。接着概述了《指导方针》的基本理念,一方面是保护受试者和患者,另一方面是鼓励新疗法和人体实验。文中将一些重大问题,如医生或研究人员的个人责任、研究与治疗伦理的教学以及对弱势群体的研究与治疗,与《纽伦堡法典》及随后受《纽伦堡法典》影响的法规进行了比较。

相似文献

1
Reichsrundschreiben 1931: pre-Nuremberg German regulations concerning new therapy and human experimentation.《帝国公告》1931年版:纽伦堡审判前德国关于新疗法和人体实验的规定。
J Med Philos. 1983 May;8(2):99-111. doi: 10.1093/jmp/8.2.99.
2
The Nuremberg Code, German law, and prominent physician-thinkers.《纽伦堡法典》、德国法律以及杰出的医学思想家。
JAMA. 1997 Mar 5;277(9):709; author reply 709-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.277.9.709b.
3
The Nuremberg Code and the Nuremberg Trial. A reappraisal.《纽伦堡法典》与纽伦堡审判。重新评估。
JAMA. 1996 Nov 27;276(20):1662-6.
4
Informed consent in human experimentation before the Nuremberg code.《纽伦堡法典》之前人体实验中的知情同意
BMJ. 1996 Dec 7;313(7070):1445-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7070.1445.
5
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
6
Revising the history of Cold War research ethics.修订冷战研究伦理史。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1996 Sep;6(3):223-37. doi: 10.1353/ken.1996.0025.
7
An overview of legal controls on human experimentation and the regulatory implications of taking Professor Katz seriously.人体实验的法律控制概述以及认真对待卡茨教授所带来的监管影响。
St Louis Univ Law J. 1993 Fall;38(1):63-134.
8
1931 German guidelines on human experimentation.1931年德国人体实验指南。
Int Dig Health Legis. 1980;31(2):408-11.
9
The Nuremberg Code: Hippocratic ethics and human rights.《纽伦堡法典》:希波克拉底伦理与人权。
Lancet. 1998 Mar 28;351(9107):974-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)60641-1.
10
Legal and ethical concepts involved in informed consent to human research.人体研究知情同意中的法律和伦理概念。
Calif West Law Rev. 1981 Fall;18(1):50-79.

引用本文的文献

1
Vulnerability in research ethics: A call for assessing vulnerability and implementing protections.研究伦理中的脆弱性:评估脆弱性和实施保护的呼吁。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Aug 20;121(34):e2322821121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2322821121. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
2
Conducting Drug Treatment Trials in Children: Opportunities and Challenges.儿童药物治疗试验:机遇与挑战。
Pharmaceut Med. 2024 May;38(3):179-204. doi: 10.1007/s40290-024-00523-0. Epub 2024 May 10.
3
[The genesis of informed consent in the context of medical research ethics 1900-1931].
[医学研究伦理背景下知情同意的起源 1900 - 1931]
Urologie. 2023 Mar;62(3):261-270. doi: 10.1007/s00120-023-02042-3. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
4
Medical experimentation on prisoners (part 3): the main milestones of the evolving ethical' texts and codes.对囚犯进行医学实验(三):不断演变的“伦理”文本和规范的主要里程碑。
Tunis Med. 2022 Aug-Sep;100(8-9):572-577.
5
Six Values Never to Silence: Jewish Perspectives on Nazi Medical Professionalism.六个绝不能被沉默的价值观:犹太人对纳粹医学专业精神的看法
Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2018 Jan 29;9(1):e0007. doi: 10.5041/RMMJ.10327.
6
Ethics Guidelines in Environmental Epidemiology: Their Development and Challenges We Face.环境流行病学中的伦理准则:制定及其面临的挑战。
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2017 Jun;4(2):142-155. doi: 10.1007/s40572-017-0138-z.
7
Research Ethics 2.0: New Perspectives on Norms, Values, and Integrity in Genomic Research in Times of Even Scarcer Resources.研究伦理2.0:资源更为稀缺时代下基因组研究中规范、价值观与诚信的新视角
Public Health Genomics. 2017;20(1):27-35. doi: 10.1159/000462960. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
8
Research participants' perceptions and views on consent for biobank research: a review of empirical data and ethical analysis.研究参与者对生物样本库研究知情同意的认知与观点:实证数据回顾与伦理分析
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Sep 9;16:60. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0053-5.
9
Ethics of clinical research with mentally ill persons.精神病人参与临床研究的伦理问题。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2012 Aug;262(5):441-52. doi: 10.1007/s00406-011-0287-2. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
10
An organizational perspective on ethics as a form of regulation.
Med Health Care Philos. 2009 Nov;12(4):385-92. doi: 10.1007/s11019-009-9210-2. Epub 2009 Jun 19.