• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢克洛与甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑治疗急性中耳炎的比较。

Comparison of cefaclor and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in the treatment of acute otitis media.

作者信息

Blumer J L, Bertino J S, Husak M P

出版信息

Pediatr Infect Dis. 1984 Jan-Feb;3(1):25-9. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198401000-00007.

DOI:10.1097/00006454-198401000-00007
PMID:6366771
Abstract

The efficacy and safety of cefaclor and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) were compared in 100 children with acute otitis media assigned to the two treatment groups in a double-blind, randomized fashion. Treatment was for 10 days. Each patient had a diagnostic tympanocentesis before starting therapy. Pathogens were isolated from the middle ear aspirate in 49% of the cases, and organisms considered nonpathogenic were isolated as pure cultures from an additional 19%. Of the 100 patients 4 of 50 in the cefaclor group and 2 of 50 in the TMP-SMX group were considered treatment failures. In three of the four failures with cefaclor, compliance with the first course of therapy could not be ascertained. All six patients showed a good therapeutic response to an additional 10-day course of cefaclor. We conclude that cefaclor and TMP-SMX have essentially equivalent efficacy in the treatment of acute otitis media.

摘要

采用双盲、随机方式将100名急性中耳炎患儿分为两组,比较头孢克洛和甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(TMP-SMX)的疗效和安全性。治疗为期10天。每位患者在开始治疗前均进行了诊断性鼓膜穿刺术。49%的病例中耳吸出物中分离出病原体,另有19%的病例中分离出被认为是非致病性的微生物纯培养物。100名患者中,头孢克洛组50例中有4例、TMP-SMX组50例中有2例被视为治疗失败。在头孢克洛治疗失败的4例中,有3例无法确定是否遵守了第一个疗程的治疗。所有6例患者在额外接受10天的头孢克洛治疗后均显示出良好的治疗反应。我们得出结论,头孢克洛和TMP-SMX在治疗急性中耳炎方面疗效基本相当。

相似文献

1
Comparison of cefaclor and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in the treatment of acute otitis media.头孢克洛与甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑治疗急性中耳炎的比较。
Pediatr Infect Dis. 1984 Jan-Feb;3(1):25-9. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198401000-00007.
2
A randomized controlled trial of cefaclor compared with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for treatment of acute otitis media.头孢克洛与甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑治疗急性中耳炎的随机对照试验。
J Pediatr. 1984 Oct;105(4):633-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(84)80438-2.
3
[Cefaclor and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for recurrent otitis media].[头孢克洛与甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑用于复发性中耳炎]
Harefuah. 1989 Dec 1;117(11):361-3.
4
A trial comparing cefaclor with co-trimoxazole in the treatment of acute otitis media.一项比较头孢克洛与复方新诺明治疗急性中耳炎疗效的试验。
Arch Dis Child. 1982 Aug;57(8):594-6. doi: 10.1136/adc.57.8.594.
5
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in the treatment of otitis media caused by ampicillin-resistant strains of Haemophilus influenzae.甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑治疗由耐氨苄西林流感嗜血杆菌菌株引起的中耳炎。
Rev Infect Dis. 1982 Mar-Apr;4(2):514-6. doi: 10.1093/clinids/4.2.514.
6
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in the treatment of otitis media secondary to ampicillin-resistant strains of Haemophilus influenzae.甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑治疗由耐氨苄西林流感嗜血杆菌菌株引起的中耳炎
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1980 May-Jun;89(3 Pt 2):281-4. doi: 10.1177/00034894800890s366.
7
Treatment of otitis media with cefaclor, a new oral cephalosporin.用新型口服头孢菌素头孢克洛治疗中耳炎。
South Med J. 1980 Nov;73(11):1447-9. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198011000-00008.
8
Cefaclor in treatment of otitis media and pharyngitis in children.头孢克洛治疗儿童中耳炎和咽炎。
Am J Dis Child. 1980 Jun;134(6):560-3. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1980.02130180018006.
9
Comparative efficacies of erythromycin-sulfisoxazole and cefaclor in acute otitis media: a double blind randomized trial.红霉素 - 磺胺异恶唑与头孢克洛治疗急性中耳炎的疗效比较:一项双盲随机试验。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1987 Jul;6(7):654-60. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198707000-00007.
10
Comparative treatment trial of augmentin versus cefaclor for acute otitis media with effusion.阿莫西林克拉维酸钾与头孢克洛治疗急性分泌性中耳炎的对比治疗试验。
Pediatrics. 1985 May;75(5):819-26.