Suppr超能文献

一项比较头孢克洛与复方新诺明治疗急性中耳炎疗效的试验。

A trial comparing cefaclor with co-trimoxazole in the treatment of acute otitis media.

作者信息

Feldman W, Richardson H, Rennie B, Dawson P

出版信息

Arch Dis Child. 1982 Aug;57(8):594-6. doi: 10.1136/adc.57.8.594.

Abstract

A prospective random double-blind controlled trial comparing the efficacy of cefaclor with that of co-trimoxazole in the treatment of otitis media was undertaken. Two hundred and twenty-three children aged 12 years or younger were studied. Both drugs were effective, with clinical cure or improvement in more than 90% of the children. The level of compliance was high and side effects few. Both co-trimoxazole and cefaclor can be considered safe and effective drugs for the treatment of acute otitis media.

摘要

进行了一项前瞻性随机双盲对照试验,比较头孢克洛与复方新诺明治疗中耳炎的疗效。研究了223名12岁及以下的儿童。两种药物均有效,超过90%的儿童实现了临床治愈或病情改善。依从性高,副作用少。复方新诺明和头孢克洛均可被视为治疗急性中耳炎的安全有效药物。

相似文献

6
Comparison of cefaclor and amoxicillin for acute otitis media with effusion.头孢克洛与阿莫西林治疗分泌性中耳炎的比较。
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1981 May-Jun;90(3 Pt 3):48-52. doi: 10.1177/00034894810903s212.

本文引用的文献

1
Cefadroxil in the treatment of otitis media.
J Int Med Res. 1980;8(Suppl 1):103-5.
2
Acute otitis media: diagnosis and drug therapy.
Drugs. 1980 Feb;19(2):107-18. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198019020-00003.
4
Antibiotic-resistant bacteria in otitis media with effusion.分泌性中耳炎中的耐抗生素细菌。
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1980 May-Jun;89(3 Pt 2):278-80. doi: 10.1177/00034894800890s365.
5
Cefaclor in treatment of otitis media and pharyngitis in children.头孢克洛治疗儿童中耳炎和咽炎。
Am J Dis Child. 1980 Jun;134(6):560-3. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1980.02130180018006.
6
Management of acute otitis media.急性中耳炎的管理
Lancet. 1982 Jan 9;1(8263):111. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(82)90250-1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验