Suppr超能文献

氯喹和氨苯砜治疗类风湿性关节炎的报告:一项为期6个月的对照研究。

Report on chloroquine and dapsone in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a 6-month comparative study.

作者信息

Fowler P D, Shadforth M F, Crook P R, Lawton A

出版信息

Ann Rheum Dis. 1984 Apr;43(2):200-4. doi: 10.1136/ard.43.2.200.

Abstract

A controlled study compared 6 months' treatment of 60 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Half were randomly allocated to treatment with chloroquine 250 mg daily, the other half dapsone 100 mg daily (50 mg/day for the first 7 days) following a one-month run-in assessment period. All patients had active or progressing disease. Both treatment groups showed significant improvement in morning stiffness, number of painful joints, pain scores, Ritchie index, and proximal interphalangeal joint size, and the chloroquine group alone in grip strength. Laboratory tests showed significant decreases in erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, and total serum protein levels, with significant increase in serum albumin in the dapsone group, where there was a significant mean drop in haemoglobin (less than 1 g/dl) and a rise in serum bilirubin, associated with its haemolytic effect. X-ray erosion scores were not significantly affected. The clinical and laboratory responses became evident by the time of the 2-month assessment. Criteria for clinical and laboratory improvement were defined, according to which there were 21/26 improvers in the chloroquine group and 12/29 in the dapsone group. It is concluded that although both are effective preparations, chloroquine showed a significantly higher improvement rate and was certainly better tolerated. It is the preferred treatment for patients with active or progressive disease not controlled by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, with dapsone as an alternative for patients who fail to respond to or cannot tolerate chloroquine.

摘要

一项对照研究比较了60例类风湿关节炎(RA)患者6个月的治疗情况。在为期1个月的导入评估期后,将患者随机分为两组,每组30人。一组患者每日服用250毫克氯喹进行治疗,另一组患者每日服用100毫克氨苯砜(前7天每日50毫克)。所有患者均患有活动性或进行性疾病。两个治疗组在晨僵、疼痛关节数、疼痛评分、里奇指数和近端指间关节大小方面均有显著改善,仅氯喹组在握力方面有改善。实验室检查显示,红细胞沉降率、C反应蛋白和血清总蛋白水平显著降低,氨苯砜组血清白蛋白显著升高,同时血红蛋白平均显著下降(低于1克/分升),血清胆红素升高,这与其溶血作用有关。X线侵蚀评分未受到显著影响。在2个月评估时,临床和实验室反应变得明显。定义了临床和实验室改善的标准,据此氯喹组有21/26例改善者,氨苯砜组有12/29例改善者。结论是,虽然两者都是有效的制剂,但氯喹的改善率显著更高,耐受性也肯定更好。对于非甾体抗炎药无法控制的活动性或进行性疾病患者,氯喹是首选治疗药物,氨苯砜可作为对氯喹无反应或不能耐受氯喹的患者的替代药物。

相似文献

5
Do drugs change the course of rheumatoid arthritis?药物会改变类风湿性关节炎的病程吗?
Br Med J. 1980 Apr 5;280(6219):964-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.280.6219.964-a.
9
Dapsone in rheumatoid arthritis.氨苯砜治疗类风湿关节炎
Rheumatol Rehabil. 1976 Aug;15(3):230-4. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/15.3.230.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

6
Dapsone in rheumatoid arthritis.氨苯砜治疗类风湿关节炎
Rheumatol Rehabil. 1976 Aug;15(3):230-4. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/15.3.230.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验