Suppr超能文献

非转移性肿瘤细胞与正常细胞进行体细胞杂交后获得转移特性。

Nonmetastatic tumor cells acquire metastatic properties following somatic hybridization with normal cells.

作者信息

De Baetselier P, Roos E, Brys L, Remels L, Gobert M, Dekegel D, Segal S, Feldman M

出版信息

Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1984;3(1):5-24. doi: 10.1007/BF00047690.

Abstract

Somatic cell hybridization between nonmetastatic tumor cells and normal cells of the lymphoreticular system results in hybrid cells manifesting metastatic properties of defined target organ specificity. Thus, fusion of the nonmetastatic BALB/c originated NSI plasmacytoma with C57BL B lymphocytes resulted in hybridomas, each of which were metastatic. Of 10 hybridomas, 7 generated metastases in the spleen and liver, whereas 3 generated liver metastases. The generation of liver metastases by hybridomas which homed to both spleen and liver, but not by those which homed to the liver only, was controlled by the spleen. The acquisition of metastatic properties via somatic cell fusion seems to represent a general principle, in which the normal partner determines the target organ specificity for the metastatic growth. Thus, fusion of SP2/O myeloma cells with syngeneic B lymphocytes also resulted in a hybrid cell metastasizing to the spleen and liver, yet a somatic hybrid between NSI and a macrophage or dendritic-like cell metastasized to the lung. Cell surface molecules encoded by the genome of the normal partner was demonstrated to control the target organ specificity: antibodies against MHC-encoded antigens of the normal B cell partner prevented the generation of metastases by hybridomas metastasizing to the spleen and liver, but not by those metastasizing to the liver only. This is in accordance with the function of MHC molecules on lymphocytes in controlling their homing to lymphoid organs. Hybridomas of T cell lymphomas also manifested metastatic properties. Analysis of the cell surface Thy-1 antigens of a hybridoma (DCH10), produced via somatic fusion between BW5145 lymphoma and a putative macrophage cell indicated that cells of liver metastases (DCH10-Li) generated by the hybrid cells might have undergone further somatic cell fusion in vivo with host (T?) cells. These cells have acquired new metastatic properties, generating metastases in spleen, liver and kidneys. In fact, even the inoculation of the parental BW lymphoma cells resulted in a case of liver metastasis (BW-Li). Such BW-Li cells, upon reinoculation, also generated metastases in the spleen, liver and kidneys. Analysis of the Thyl phenotype indicated that BW-Li cells may also have undergone somatic cell fusion in vivo with host (T?) cells, resulting in the acquisition of metastatic properties. The pattern of cell-cell interactions (adhesion, infiltration) with liver cell monolayers of BW-Li cells and of DCH10-Li (T-cell lymphomas) was identical, and differed from cells of liver metastases of the myeloma-B cell hybridomas which might be based on responses to liver growth signals.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

非转移性肿瘤细胞与淋巴网状系统正常细胞之间的体细胞杂交导致杂交细胞表现出具有明确靶器官特异性的转移特性。因此,源自非转移性BALB/c的NSI浆细胞瘤与C57BL B淋巴细胞融合产生了杂交瘤,每个杂交瘤都具有转移性。在10个杂交瘤中,7个在脾脏和肝脏产生转移,而3个产生肝转移。归巢至脾脏和肝脏的杂交瘤产生肝转移,而归巢至肝脏的杂交瘤则不产生肝转移,这种现象受脾脏控制。通过体细胞融合获得转移特性似乎代表了一个普遍原则,即正常伙伴决定转移生长的靶器官特异性。因此,SP2/O骨髓瘤细胞与同基因B淋巴细胞融合也产生了转移至脾脏和肝脏的杂交细胞,然而NSI与巨噬细胞或树突状样细胞之间的体细胞杂种转移至肺。已证明由正常伙伴基因组编码的细胞表面分子控制靶器官特异性:针对正常B细胞伙伴MHC编码抗原的抗体可阻止转移至脾脏和肝脏的杂交瘤产生转移,但不能阻止仅转移至肝脏的杂交瘤产生转移。这与MHC分子在控制淋巴细胞归巢至淋巴器官中的功能一致。T细胞淋巴瘤的杂交瘤也表现出转移特性。对通过BW5145淋巴瘤与假定的巨噬细胞体细胞融合产生的杂交瘤(DCH10)的细胞表面Thy-1抗原分析表明,杂交细胞产生的肝转移细胞(DCH10-Li)可能在体内与宿主(T?)细胞进一步发生了体细胞融合。这些细胞获得了新的转移特性,在脾脏、肝脏和肾脏产生转移。实际上,即使接种亲代BW淋巴瘤细胞也导致了一例肝转移(BW-Li)。这种BW-Li细胞再次接种后,也在脾脏、肝脏和肾脏产生转移。对Thyl表型的分析表明,BW-Li细胞也可能在体内与宿主(T?)细胞发生了体细胞融合,从而获得了转移特性。BW-Li细胞和DCH10-Li(T细胞淋巴瘤)与肝细胞单层的细胞间相互作用(粘附、浸润)模式相同,且与骨髓瘤-B细胞杂交瘤的肝转移细胞不同,这可能基于对肝脏生长信号的反应。(摘要截断于400字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验