Bass J B, Hawkins E L, Bonner J R, Pollock H M
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1983 Jun;1(2):95-106. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(83)90038-x.
We prospectively compared the usefulness of a bronchoscopic protected catheter technique with the results from sputum cultures in the evaluation of moxalactam, a new beta-lactam antibiotic. The significance of a given isolate on protected catheter culture was determined by quantitative bacteriology. 32 patients with community-acquired pneumonia were enrolled in the study and 31 grew common lower respiratory tract pathogens from their protected catheter specimen. The most common single pathogens recovered were Streptococcus pneumoniae (11 patients) and Haemophilus influenzae (2). Mixed flora, predominantly anaerobes, were isolated from 15 patients, and 3 patients had mixed aerobic infections. All seven bacteremic cases had the identical organism isolated from the protected catheter specimen, confirming the accuracy of the technique. Comparisons with sputum cultures showed that the predominant organism on sputum culture was the same as that obtained from the protected catheter culture in only 13% of the cases. Sputum cultures revealed either no pathogen or a different pathogen in 23 cases, and no sputum could be obtained in 4. Compared to cultures of expectorated sputum, we found the protected catheter bronchoscopic culture technique to have the following advantages in the bacteriologic evaluation of moxalactam: 1) greater accuracy and sensitivity in bacteremic patients; 2) accurate delineation of the bacteriology of infections; and 3) a higher percentage of patients with evaluable bacteriology leading to greater efficiency during the investigation.
