Henry N K, Washington J A
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1984 Apr;2(2):107-11. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(84)90005-1.
Routine subculture of macroscopically negative blood cultures is a traditional blood culture procedure. The need to perform routine early (6-17 hr) and late (48 hr) subculture of unvented blood culture bottles when a simultaneous subculture of the vented bottle is performed has been questioned. Blood cultures in paired vented and unvented tryptic soy broth (TSB) bottles from 4574 patients were examined retrospectively. Subculture of unvented TSB bottles provided initial detection of 412 (5.0%) isolates from 277 (6.1%) patients and was comparable to that of vented TSB bottles for Pseudomonas and all other microorganisms, except for the Enterobacteriaceae (p less than 0.001; vented TSB), Candida (p less than 0.001; vented TSB), and Haemophilus influenzae (p less than 0.01; unvented TSB). Of the H. influenzae isolates, 46% were detected initially by subculture of the unvented TSB bottles; early subculture recovered 67% of these isolates. The value of subculture of unvented TSB bottles is minimized when subculture of the vented TSB bottle is routinely performed; however, routine subculture of the unvented bottle is recommended whenever TSB is used for detection of bacteremia in patients in whom H. influenzae infection is possible.
对肉眼观察为阴性的血培养物进行常规传代培养是一种传统的血培养方法。当对通气血培养瓶进行同步传代培养时,是否有必要对未通气血培养瓶进行常规早期(6 - 17小时)和晚期(48小时)传代培养受到了质疑。对来自4574例患者的成对通气和未通气胰蛋白酶大豆肉汤(TSB)瓶中的血培养物进行了回顾性检查。未通气TSB瓶的传代培养从277例(6.1%)患者中初步检测出412株(5.0%)分离株,对于假单胞菌和除肠杆菌科(p < 0.001;通气TSB)、念珠菌(p < 0.001;通气TSB)和流感嗜血杆菌(p < 0.01;未通气TSB)之外的所有其他微生物,其与通气TSB瓶的传代培养效果相当。在流感嗜血杆菌分离株中,46%最初通过未通气TSB瓶的传代培养检测到;早期传代培养回收了这些分离株的67%。当常规对通气TSB瓶进行传代培养时,未通气TSB瓶传代培养的价值最小化;然而,只要使用TSB检测可能感染流感嗜血杆菌患者的菌血症,建议对未通气瓶进行常规传代培养。