Cevenini R, Sarov I, Rumpianesi F, Donati M, Melega C, Varotti C, La Placa M
J Clin Pathol. 1984 Jun;37(6):686-91. doi: 10.1136/jcp.37.6.686.
Sera obtained from 34 men with Chlamydia trachomatis positive non-gonococcal urethritis, 34 men with C trachomatis negative non-gonococcal urethritis, 42 women with acute salpingitis, 38 healthy women, and 34 healthy men were studied for the presence of specific serum C trachomatis IgA and IgG antibodies. Serological results were correlated with C trachomatis isolation in cell culture. An enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for C trachomatis specific serum IgA was employed using highly purified elementary bodies of C trachomatis serotype L2 grown in LLC-MK2 cells. Results obtained for C trachomatis IgA antibody by the ELISA test were compared with results obtained for the same sera by a single antigen immunofluorescence technique. A good correlation (r = 0.91) was found between two methods. Serum IgG antibody was also determined in the same sera by the immunofluorescence technique. Patients with C trachomatis positive non-gonococcal urethritis had a significantly (p less than 0.0005) higher prevalence (94.1%) of serum IgA antibody by ELISA compared with patients with C trachomatis negative non-gonococcal urethritis (20.5%) or healthy men (5.9%). Similarly, women with acute salpingitis had a significantly (p less than 0.005) higher prevalence of serum IgA antibody (45.2%) compared with healthy controls (5.2%). Comparable results were obtained for C trachomatis serum IgA antibody using the immunofluorescence technique. The prevalence of C trachomatis IgG antibody was significantly higher in patients with C trachomatis positive non-gonococcal urethritis (97.0%) compared with those with C trachomatis negative non-gonococcal urethritis (33.3%) and healthy controls (23.5%). The importance of using specific C trachomatis serum IgA in the identification of chlamydial infection is discussed.
对34例沙眼衣原体阳性的非淋菌性尿道炎男性、34例沙眼衣原体阴性的非淋菌性尿道炎男性、42例急性输卵管炎女性、38例健康女性及34例健康男性的血清进行研究,检测其中特异性沙眼衣原体血清IgA和IgG抗体的存在情况。血清学结果与细胞培养中沙眼衣原体的分离情况相关。采用在LLC-MK2细胞中生长的高度纯化的沙眼衣原体L2血清型原体,进行沙眼衣原体特异性血清IgA的酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)。将ELISA检测获得的沙眼衣原体IgA抗体结果与用单抗原免疫荧光技术对相同血清检测获得的结果进行比较。两种方法之间存在良好的相关性(r = 0.91)。还用免疫荧光技术测定了相同血清中的IgG抗体。与沙眼衣原体阴性的非淋菌性尿道炎患者(20.5%)或健康男性(5.9%)相比,沙眼衣原体阳性的非淋菌性尿道炎患者通过ELISA检测的血清IgA抗体患病率显著更高(94.1%,p<0.0005)。同样,与健康对照者(5.2%)相比,急性输卵管炎女性血清IgA抗体患病率显著更高(45.2%,p<0.005)。采用免疫荧光技术检测沙眼衣原体血清IgA抗体也得到了类似结果。与沙眼衣原体阴性的非淋菌性尿道炎患者(33.3%)和健康对照者(23.5%)相比,沙眼衣原体阳性的非淋菌性尿道炎患者中沙眼衣原体IgG抗体患病率显著更高(97.0%)。文中讨论了使用特异性沙眼衣原体血清IgA在衣原体感染诊断中的重要性。