Sieper J, Braun J, Reichardt M, Eggens U
Department of Medicine, Klinikum Steglitz, Free University of Berlin, Germany.
Clin Rheumatol. 1993 Jun;12(2):245-52. doi: 10.1007/BF02231536.
Joint inflammation, predominantly of the lower limbs, occurring some weeks after urogenital or gastrointestinal infection is classified as reactive arthritis (ReA) but there is no general agreement on diagnostic criteria, especially if the preceding infections are asymptomatic. The same is true for Lyme disease (LD) which is caused by Borrelia burgdorferi (BB). Determination of antibody titre or culture of urethral swabs and stools are often used as diagnostic tools. We examined 4 groups of patients: one with undifferentiated arthritis (Group I, n = 55), one with well-defined rheumatic diseases other than ReA (n = 43, Group II), one group without joint disease (n = 50, Group III) and one with ReA or LD (n = 7). Specific antibacterial antibody titres in serum were measured in all patients; stool and urethral cultures were performed in all groups except the last. A calculation of positive predictive value (PPV) was done for each test. Evidence of present or previous infection with the microbes Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Mycoplasma urethritidis (MU), Yersinia enterocolitica (YE) and BB were found in all groups. In Group I, Group II and Group III respectively, positive serological results were found for CT IgA (20%, 31%, 16%) and IgG (49%, 51%, 34%), YE (7%, 6%, 0%) and BB (17%, 2%, 10%). Positive cultures were found in Group I and Group II respectively for CT (28%, 29%) and MU (14%, 17%). Therefore no test had a significant positive predictive value for ReA in the general population and even in the rheumatology clinic the PPV for most tests was low. We conclude that these methods are of little value in the diagnosis of reactive arthritis when the preceding infection is asymptomatic.
泌尿生殖系统或胃肠道感染数周后出现的关节炎症,主要累及下肢,被归类为反应性关节炎(ReA),但对于诊断标准尚无普遍共识,尤其是当前驱感染无症状时。莱姆病(LD)也是如此,它由伯氏疏螺旋体(BB)引起。抗体滴度测定或尿道拭子及粪便培养常被用作诊断工具。我们检查了4组患者:一组为未分化关节炎患者(第一组,n = 55),一组为除ReA外明确的风湿性疾病患者(n = 43,第二组),一组无关节疾病患者(n = 50,第三组),还有一组患有ReA或LD患者(n = 7)。对所有患者测定血清中特异性抗菌抗体滴度;除最后一组外,对所有组进行粪便和尿道培养。对每项检测计算阳性预测值(PPV)。在所有组中均发现有沙眼衣原体(CT)、解脲脲原体(MU)、小肠结肠炎耶尔森菌(YE)和BB等微生物当前或既往感染的证据。在第一组、第二组和第三组中,CT IgA(分别为20%、31%、16%)和IgG(分别为49%、51%、34%)、YE(分别为7%、6%、0%)和BB(分别为17%、2%、10%)的血清学检测结果呈阳性。在第一组和第二组中,CT(分别为28%、29%)和MU(分别为14%、17%)的培养结果呈阳性)。因此,在一般人群中,没有一项检测对ReA具有显著的阳性预测值,甚至在风湿病诊所,大多数检测的PPV也很低。我们得出结论,当前驱感染无症状时,这些方法在反应性关节炎的诊断中价值不大。