Rabkin S W, Boyko E, Shane F, Kaufert J
Addict Behav. 1984;9(2):157-73. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(84)90053-4.
The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of hypnosis, health education, and behaviour modification programs for cigarette smoking cessation. A randomized clinical trial comparing these three programs and a control group was conducted in 168 volunteers. Follow-up data three weeks after completion was available in 140 subjects. Each program showed significant reductions in reported cigarette consumption and serum thiocyanate levels, an indicator of long-term cigarette consumption, compared to entry and to the control group. However, there were no significant differences between the hypnosis, health education, or behaviour modification groups with respect to the proportion who reported quitting smoking, the number cigarettes smoked or change in serum thiocyanate levels. Reported cigarette consumption ascertained six months later again showed no significant differences between these three approaches. Factors such as subject age, age at starting cigarette smoking, educational level, marital status, spouse or partners smoking did not identify subgroups with differences between treatment responses. Thus, hypnosis, health education, and behaviour modification are each effective programs for changing cigarette smoking and each is equally effective in this regard.
本研究的目的是确定催眠、健康教育和行为改变计划对戒烟的疗效。在168名志愿者中进行了一项随机临床试验，比较这三个计划和一个对照组。140名受试者可获得完成后三周的随访数据。与入组时和对照组相比，每个计划在报告的香烟消费量和血清硫氰酸盐水平（长期香烟消费的一个指标）方面均显示出显著降低。然而，在报告戒烟的比例、吸烟数量或血清硫氰酸盐水平变化方面，催眠、健康教育或行为改变组之间没有显著差异。六个月后确定的报告香烟消费量在这三种方法之间再次没有显著差异。受试者年龄、开始吸烟的年龄、教育水平、婚姻状况、配偶或伴侣吸烟等因素并未识别出治疗反应存在差异的亚组。因此，催眠、健康教育和行为改变都是改变吸烟行为的有效计划，并且在这方面它们同样有效。
