Suppr超能文献

使用API 20E、Oxi/Ferm和Minitek系统鉴定非发酵菌和氧化酶阳性发酵菌:七年经验

Use of the API 20E, Oxi/Ferm, and Minitek systems to identify nonfermentative and oxidase-positive fermentative bacteria: seven years of experience.

作者信息

Oberhofer T R

出版信息

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1983 Sep;1(3):241-56. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(83)90024-x.

Abstract

The API 20E (API) system, the Oxi/Ferm (OXF) system, and the Minitek (MIN) system were used over a seven-year period to identify clinical isolates of nonfermentative bacteria (NFB) and oxidase-positive fermentative bacteria (OPFB). A total of 742 NFB and OPFB were tested with the API system, 988 with the OXF system, and 918 with the MIN system. The organisms represented 34 recognized species, nine alpha-numeric designates, and three species of unnamed NFB. Results were compared to those obtained with conventional test methods, which were considered correct in all instances. The accuracy of identification of NFB and OPFB was 61% with API, 80% with OXF, and 72% with MIN. Identification was more favorable for all systems with the oxidase-negative bacteria than with the oxidase-positive bacteria. API successfully identified 84% of the oxidase-negative organisms compared to 48% of the oxidase-positive organisms, OXF identified 93% compared to 75%, and MIN identified 96% compared to 61%. Failure of identification was usually a result of failure of the generated codes to appear in the compendia, rather than of misidentification, especially for the oxidase-positive organisms. The OXF system required the greatest number of supplemental tests for identification with a ratio of .65 (supplemental tests per isolate) and the API the least (.20). The API system generated the most codes with a ratio of .46 and the OXF system the fewest codes (.16).

摘要

在七年的时间里,使用API 20E(API)系统、Oxi/Ferm(OXF)系统和Minitek(MIN)系统来鉴定非发酵菌(NFB)和氧化酶阳性发酵菌(OPFB)的临床分离株。共有742株NFB和OPFB用API系统进行了测试,988株用OXF系统进行了测试,918株用MIN系统进行了测试。这些菌株代表了34个已确认的物种、9个字母数字编号以及3种未命名的NFB。将结果与用传统测试方法获得的结果进行比较,传统测试方法在所有情况下都被认为是正确的。API对NFB和OPFB的鉴定准确率为61%,OXF为80%,MIN为72%。所有系统对氧化酶阴性菌的鉴定比对氧化酶阳性菌更有利。API成功鉴定了84%的氧化酶阴性菌,而氧化酶阳性菌为48%;OXF鉴定的氧化酶阴性菌为93%,氧化酶阳性菌为75%;MIN鉴定的氧化酶阴性菌为96%,氧化酶阳性菌为61%。鉴定失败通常是由于生成的编码未出现在手册中,而不是错误鉴定,尤其是对于氧化酶阳性菌。OXF系统鉴定所需的补充测试数量最多,比例为0.65(每株分离菌的补充测试数),API最少(0.20)。API系统生成的编码最多,比例为0.46,OXF系统生成的编码最少(0.16)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验