Suppr超能文献

热生物反馈作为原发性高血压治疗方法的对照评估初步结果。

Preliminary results from a controlled evaluation of thermal biofeedback as a treatment for essential hypertension.

作者信息

Blanchard E B, McCoy G C, Andrasik F, Acerra M, Pallmeyer T P, Gerardi R, Halpern M, Musso A

出版信息

Biofeedback Self Regul. 1984 Dec;9(4):471-95. doi: 10.1007/BF01000564.

Abstract

In a controlled trial, thermal biofeedback (n = 20) and abbreviated progressive relaxation (n = 22) were compared in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertensive patients whose blood pressures (BP) were initially controlled on two medications. For the clinical end point of maintaining control of BP on a single drug after treatment, biofeedback was superior to relaxation training (at 3 months, 47% success for biofeedback versus 23% for relaxation). This same result tended to be true for patient-measured home BPs. BPs from laboratory psychophysiological testing showed no consistent advantage for one treatment over the other.

摘要

在一项对照试验中,对20名采用热生物反馈疗法和22名采用简化渐进性放松疗法的轻至中度高血压患者进行了比较,这些患者的血压最初通过两种药物得到控制。对于治疗后仅用一种药物维持血压控制的临床终点,生物反馈疗法优于放松训练(3个月时,生物反馈疗法的成功率为47%,而放松训练为23%)。患者自测的家庭血压也呈现出同样的结果。实验室心理生理测试的血压结果显示,一种治疗方法并不始终比另一种具有优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验