Suppr超能文献

[酵母样真菌的鉴定:4种商业系统的评估]

[Identification of yeast-like fungi: evaluation of 4 commercial systems].

作者信息

Russolo S, Sala A, Crotti D

出版信息

Quad Sclavo Diagn. 1984 Dec;20(4):372-8.

PMID:6399580
Abstract

Four different commercial systems were compared to identify 110 medically important yeast-like fungi found out in as many pathologic materials in three Medical Centers. The systems were: a) API 20C Aux (Ayerst), which represented the reference method in conjunction with the germ-tube test, aggregates 19 carbohydrate substrates for assimilation reactions; b) Uni-Yeast Tek (Flow) and Mycotube (Roche) were used to indicate assimilation and fermentation of 7 carbohydrate substrates and to determine other biochemical tests; c) Candida-Check (Poli) was based on agglutination reaction by specific antisera. Comparative testing of the methods provided correct identifications for 99.1% by API 20C Aux, 95.4% by Candida-Check, 89.1% by Mycotube, 88.2% by Uni-Yeast Tek. The good concordance of the methods and their optimal manuality, rapidity, and economy suggest a wider diffusion in microbiological laboratories.

摘要

对四种不同的商业系统进行了比较,以鉴定在三个医疗中心的同样多病理材料中发现的110种具有医学重要性的类酵母真菌。这些系统分别是:a) API 20C Aux(艾尔斯特公司),它与芽管试验一起作为参考方法,汇总了19种用于同化反应的碳水化合物底物;b) Uni-Yeast Tek(福罗公司)和Mycotube(罗氏公司)用于检测7种碳水化合物底物的同化和发酵情况,并进行其他生化试验;c) Candida-Check(波利公司)基于特异性抗血清的凝集反应。方法的比较测试结果显示,API 20C Aux的正确鉴定率为99.1%,Candida-Check为95.4%,Mycotube为89.1%,Uni-Yeast Tek为88.2%。这些方法的良好一致性以及它们最佳的手工操作性、快速性和经济性表明,它们在微生物实验室中具有更广泛应用的潜力。

相似文献

5
Conventional and rapid methods for yeast identification.酵母鉴定的传统方法与快速方法。
Crit Rev Microbiol. 1987;14(4):273-89. doi: 10.3109/10408418709104441.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验