Itil T M, Shrivastava R K, Mukherjee S, Coleman B S, Michael S T
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1983;15 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):433S-438S. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1983.tb02134.x.
1 A double-blind placebo-controlled study of fluvoxamine and imipramine was performed in a group of depressed patients. Twenty-two patients received fluvoxamine (mean dose 101 mg/day), 25 received imipramine (mean dose 127 mg/day) and 22 received placebo. 2 Apart from an increase in the SGOT and SGPT values of four imipramine patients, no statistically significant changes in haematology or urinalysis were judged to be medically relevant. Fluvoxamine exhibited fewer anticholinergic side effects than imipramine. 3 Both fluvoxamine treated patients and imipramine-treated patients exhibited a statistically significant improvement at the end of the 28-day treatment period with respect to the placebo patients, as measured using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, and the Clinical Global Impression Scale. Evaluations of the results of the Beck Depression Inventory and the Profile of Mood States revealed a statistically significant improvement for imipramine patients with respect to placebo at week 4, but not for fluvoxamine patients. It is postulated on the basis of quantitative pharmaco-EEG findings, that the slight superiority of imipramine over fluvoxamine was due to underdosing of the latter.
1 对一组抑郁症患者进行了氟伏沙明和丙咪嗪的双盲安慰剂对照研究。22名患者接受氟伏沙明治疗(平均剂量101毫克/天),25名患者接受丙咪嗪治疗(平均剂量127毫克/天),22名患者接受安慰剂治疗。2 除4名丙咪嗪治疗患者的血清谷草转氨酶(SGOT)和血清谷丙转氨酶(SGPT)值升高外,血液学或尿液分析中无统计学显著变化被判定与医学相关。氟伏沙明的抗胆碱能副作用比丙咪嗪少。3 使用汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表和临床总体印象量表测量,在28天治疗期结束时,接受氟伏沙明治疗的患者和接受丙咪嗪治疗的患者相对于接受安慰剂治疗的患者均表现出统计学显著改善。贝克抑郁量表和情绪状态剖面图结果的评估显示,丙咪嗪治疗患者在第4周相对于安慰剂有统计学显著改善,但氟伏沙明治疗患者没有。根据定量药物脑电图研究结果推测,丙咪嗪比氟伏沙明略具优势是由于后者剂量不足。