Suppr超能文献

通过比浊法、放射免疫扩散法和柱结合强度测量的抗血清亲和力差异。

Disparity in antiserum avidity as measured by nephelometry, radial immunodiffusion, and column-binding strength.

作者信息

Hudson G A, Haddow J E, Ritchie R F

出版信息

Clin Chim Acta. 1983 May 30;130(2):239-44. doi: 10.1016/0009-8981(83)90121-3.

Abstract

When antiserum potency is being assessed, avidity is often inferred from affinity measurements or from measurements obtained from completely unrelated immunoassay techniques. The present experiments describe an instance where antibodies that have very high column-binding strength, obtained by elution from immobilized antigen with dissociating agents, have low avidity in nephelometry and radial immunodiffusion. This low avidity appears not to be due to molecular damage since the eluted antibodies do not contain molecular aggregates and retain their column-binding strength when reapplied to the immobilized antigen. We theorize that in nephelometry and radial immunodiffusion, lattice formation may require a heterogeneous population of antibodies and that the low avidity fractions may have too limited a specificity. We support this theory by combining two different populations of low avidity antibodies and finding that the combination produces a nephelometric response greater than that of either fraction alone.

摘要

在评估抗血清效力时,亲和力通常是从亲和力测量值或从完全不相关的免疫分析技术获得的测量值推断出来的。本实验描述了一个实例,即通过用解离剂从固定化抗原上洗脱获得的具有非常高的柱结合强度的抗体,在比浊法和放射免疫扩散法中亲和力较低。这种低亲和力似乎不是由于分子损伤,因为洗脱的抗体不包含分子聚集体,并且当重新应用于固定化抗原时保留其柱结合强度。我们推测,在比浊法和放射免疫扩散法中,晶格形成可能需要异质性的抗体群体,而低亲和力部分的特异性可能过于有限。我们通过将两种不同的低亲和力抗体群体组合在一起并发现该组合产生的比浊反应大于单独任何一个部分的比浊反应来支持这一理论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验