Cleaton-Jones P, Austin J C, Fatti L P, Valcke C F, McInnes-Ledoux P M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1983 Sep;56(3):310-6. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(83)90014-2.
In the assessment of pulpal responses to dental materials there is no general agreement regarding which system should be used in the selection of histologic sections for assessment and which negative and positive control materials should be used. The present study is an evaluation, on 227 sections, of two pulpal assessment systems and three section-selection methods using a negative (zinc oxide and eugenol cement) and a positive (silicate) control material. The results indicate that, depending on which system is used, considerable variation in response can be noted. Better standardization of methods is necessary.
在评估牙髓对牙科材料的反应时，对于在选择用于评估的组织学切片时应使用哪种系统以及应使用哪些阴性和阳性对照材料，尚无普遍共识。本研究对227个切片使用阴性（氧化锌丁香酚水门汀）和阳性（硅酸盐）对照材料，评估了两种牙髓评估系统和三种切片选择方法。结果表明，根据所使用的系统不同，可观察到反应存在相当大的差异。方法需要更好地标准化。
