Fleisch L, Cleaton-Jones P, Forbes M, van Wyk J, Fat C
J Oral Pathol. 1984 Dec;13(6):622-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1984.tb01464.x.
The pulpal response to Protemp (ESPE Gmbh) was compared to zinc oxide-eugenol, Super Syntrex (de Trey) and Protemp plus zinc oxide-eugenol liner in 144 vervet monkey (Cercopithecus pygerythus) incisor teeth, according to ADA Specification No. 41. Cellular displacement into dentinal tubules, superficial and deep inflammation were present only in the 3-day specimens in all materials. Mean scores for the test material were lower than both negative and positive controls. In the 30-day specimens the prevalence of reparative dentine under the test material was similar to the negative control, while at 90 days it was less than the negative control, although the severity in affected specimens was more than the positive control. Use of a zinc oxide-eugenol liner reduced the severity of reparative dentine formation.
根据美国牙科协会第41号规范，在144颗黑长尾猴（Cercopithecus pygerythus）的切牙中，将Protemp（ESPE GmbH公司）与氧化锌丁香酚、Super Syntrex（德瑞公司）以及Protemp加氧化锌丁香酚衬层材料的牙髓反应进行了比较。在所有材料的3天样本中，均出现了细胞向牙本质小管内移位、浅层和深层炎症。测试材料的平均评分低于阴性和阳性对照。在30天的样本中，测试材料下方修复性牙本质的发生率与阴性对照相似，而在90天时则低于阴性对照，尽管受影响样本中的严重程度高于阳性对照。使用氧化锌丁香酚衬层降低了修复性牙本质形成的严重程度。
