Suppr超能文献

[肌内注射咪达唑仑作为区域麻醉术前用药的呼吸及促眠作用。与地西泮、异丙嗪/哌替啶及安慰剂的比较]

[Respiratory and sleep-inducing effects of i.m. midazolam as premedication for regional anesthesia. Comparison with diazepam, promethazine/pethidine and placebo].

作者信息

Reinhart K, Dallinger-Stiller G, Heinemeyer G, Dennhardt R, Eyrich K

出版信息

Anaesthesist. 1983 Nov;32(11):525-31.

PMID:6419633
Abstract

The effects of respiratory depression and sleep induction produced by 0.1 mg/kg and 0.15 mg/kg of midazolam i.m. were examined in patients in whom urological interventions had to be performed under spinal anesthesia. The same parameters were evaluated for 0.2 mg/kg of diazepam i.m. as well as 50 mg/50 mg of pethidine/promethazine i.m. and placebo i.m. The major difference between 0.1 mg and 0.15 mg/kg body weight of midazolam was a more pronounced PCO2-increase in the group with the higher dosage. Both dosages led to anterograde amnesia in 8 or 9 of 10 patients respectively. No amnesia developed in the control groups. Respiratory depression and sleep induction occurred later with promethazine/pethidine (at 60 min) or diazepam (at 120 min) than with midazolam. Noteworthy in the Diazepam and placebo group was a hyperventilation lasting 60 and 120 min respectively. The arterial PO2 decreased in all groups during the intervention. Under midazolam, the decrease was significantly higher statistically than in the control groups during the first 60 min at both dosages. Premedication with 0.1 mg/kg i.m. of midazolam proved to be sufficient in all patients. The rapid onset of action, the sleep during the intervention and the amnesia associated with it suggest that this form of premedication is more favorable than the other procedures examined. The dosage of 0.15 mg/kg of midazolam proved to be too high: in addition to producing a stronger respiratory depression, it had the effect of rendering cooperation with some patients more difficult.

摘要

在必须接受脊髓麻醉进行泌尿外科手术的患者中,研究了肌肉注射0.1mg/kg和0.15mg/kg咪达唑仑产生的呼吸抑制和诱导睡眠的效果。同时评估了肌肉注射0.2mg/kg地西泮、50mg/50mg哌替啶/异丙嗪以及安慰剂的相同参数。咪达唑仑0.1mg/kg和0.15mg/kg体重组的主要差异在于,高剂量组的PCO2升高更为明显。两种剂量分别导致10名患者中的8名或9名出现顺行性遗忘。对照组未出现遗忘现象。异丙嗪/哌替啶(60分钟时)或地西泮(120分钟时)引起的呼吸抑制和诱导睡眠比咪达唑仑出现得晚。值得注意的是,地西泮组和安慰剂组分别出现了持续60分钟和120分钟的通气过度。干预期间所有组的动脉PO2均下降。使用咪达唑仑时,在两种剂量下,前60分钟内的下降在统计学上显著高于对照组。事实证明,所有患者肌肉注射0.1mg/kg咪达唑仑进行术前用药就足够了。其起效迅速、术中睡眠以及与之相关的遗忘表明,这种术前用药形式比所研究的其他方法更具优势。0.15mg/kg咪达唑仑的剂量被证明过高:除了产生更强的呼吸抑制外,还使得与一些患者的合作更加困难。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验