Anderson R J, Reilly P M
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Apr 14;288(6424):1129-31. doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6424.1129.
Using a standard analysis of one month's prescribing in a general practice we showed a potential saving of 8.8% (pounds 883.22) of the net cost of ingredients through substituting exact generic alternatives. Our results confirm the possible reduction in cost of drugs to the National Health Service by the use of generic substitution as suggested in the Greenfield report. Although substitution was theoretically available in most therapeutic classes, two thirds of the potential savings pertained to two classes, preparations acting on the nervous system and preparations acting on the cardiovascular system and diuretics. Of the prescriptions (31%) with potential generic alternatives, less than three quarters were actually available.
通过对一家普通诊所一个月的处方进行标准分析,我们发现通过替换确切的通用替代品,成分净成本可潜在节省8.8%(883.22英镑)。我们的结果证实了如格林菲尔德报告中所建议的,使用通用替代品可能会降低国家医疗服务体系的药品成本。虽然理论上大多数治疗类别都可以进行替代,但三分之二的潜在节省涉及两个类别,即作用于神经系统的制剂以及作用于心血管系统和利尿剂的制剂。在有潜在通用替代品的处方中(31%),实际可用的不到四分之三。