Moeller D W, Fujimoto K
Health Phys. 1984 Jun;46(6):1181-93. doi: 10.1097/00004032-198406000-00002.
Based on assumed conditions within a typical U.S. home, annualized costs for reducing indoor airborne radon progeny concentrations have been calculated for a variety of methods of control. These analyses were limited to methods for control in existing homes. Control through modified construction techniques was not evaluated. Methods assessed included increased air circulation, increased ventilation, particle removal using electrostatic precipitation and unipolar ion generation, and the application of sealants to room surfaces. Although surface sealants proved to be reasonably cost-effective per person- sievert dose reduction, such sealants are prone to cracking and the durability of their effectiveness is questionable. Use of ceiling fans for increased air circulation and particle deposition appears to be least cost-effective, but this method may be attractive in some cases for reasons of comfort. The use of unipolar ion generators appears to be the best approach from the standpoint of cost effectiveness. These devices are also easy to install and are esthetically readily acceptable.
基于美国典型家庭内部的假定条件，已针对多种控制方法计算出降低室内空气中氡子体浓度的年化成本。这些分析仅限于现有住宅的控制方法。未评估通过改进建筑技术进行的控制。评估的方法包括增加空气流通、增加通风、使用静电沉淀和单极离子生成去除颗粒，以及在房间表面涂抹密封剂。尽管表面密封剂在每人 - 希沃特剂量降低方面被证明具有合理的成本效益，但此类密封剂容易开裂，其有效性的耐久性也存在疑问。使用吊扇增加空气流通和颗粒沉积似乎成本效益最低，但出于舒适度考虑，这种方法在某些情况下可能具有吸引力。从成本效益的角度来看，使用单极离子发生器似乎是最佳方法。这些设备也易于安装，在美观上也很容易被接受。
