Suppr超能文献

单通道与多通道膀胱测压在诊断膀胱不稳定方面的比较。

Comparison of single and multichannel cystometry in diagnosing bladder instability.

作者信息

Sutherst J R, Brown M C

出版信息

Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Jun 9;288(6432):1720-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6432.1720.

Abstract

The abilities of single channel cystometry and standard multichannel cystometry to diagnose bladder instability were compared in 100 women taking part in a single blind crossover trial. In 93 of the women both tests yielded the same result. The single channel system detected every case of detrusor instability but in seven women suggested detrusor contractions that were not evident on multichannel cystometry. These were probably due to changes in abdominal pressure. It is concluded that single channel cystometry when used in conjunction with simple urethral tests can provide most of the information that is obtained in specialist centres investigating bladder function.

摘要

在一项单盲交叉试验中,对100名女性进行了单通道膀胱测压法和标准多通道膀胱测压法诊断膀胱不稳定的能力比较。在93名女性中,两种测试结果相同。单通道系统检测出了每一例逼尿肌不稳定病例,但在7名女性中提示有多通道膀胱测压法未发现的逼尿肌收缩。这些可能是由于腹压变化所致。结论是,单通道膀胱测压法与简单的尿道测试相结合,能够提供在专业中心研究膀胱功能时所获得的大部分信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a788/1441530/96f7c91c673f/bmjcred00504-0016-a.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验