Hess J, Gammelgaard P, Holst B, Rasmussen F, Thomsen V F
Infection. 1984 Jul-Aug;12(4):270-3. doi: 10.1007/BF01645959.
A total of 64 out-patients with significant urinary tract infection were randomly allocated to treatment with cefroxadine 250 mg q.i.d. or cephalexin 500 mg q.i.d. for ten days. Urine cultures were performed before allocation to the treatment groups and on Days 0, 1, 3, 7 and 21. Twenty patients discontinued treatment prematurely because of insignificant bacteriuria on Day 0. Both drug regimes--the cefroxadine dose was half that of cephalexin--showed good activity during treatment, and no statistically significant differences were found between the two drugs. At follow-up, several relapses were found in both treatment groups. Adverse drug reactions were only reported by three patients in the cefroxadine group, and by none in the cephalexin group.
总共64例有明显尿路感染的门诊患者被随机分配,分别接受头孢沙定250毫克每日4次或头孢氨苄500毫克每日4次的治疗,疗程为10天。在分配至治疗组之前以及第0、1、3、7和21天进行尿培养。20例患者因第0天细菌尿不明显而提前终止治疗。两种药物治疗方案(头孢沙定剂量为头孢氨苄的一半)在治疗期间均显示出良好的活性,两种药物之间未发现统计学上的显著差异。在随访中,两个治疗组均发现了几例复发情况。只有头孢沙定组的3例患者报告了药物不良反应,头孢氨苄组无不良反应报告。