So A, Brenner M K, Hill I D, Asherson G L, Webster A D
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Nov 3;289(6453):1177-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6453.1177.
Intravenous gammaglobulin was compared with the standard British intramuscular preparation in patients with hypogammaglobulinaemia and chronic bronchitis. Five patients were given six months' treatment with the weekly intramuscular preparation and six months' treatment with intravenous gammaglobulin given once every 18 days. During the trial they recorded symptoms of infection, absence from work, and sputum volume; lung function tests were performed during the intravenous treatment. The half life of the intravenous IgG and changes in serum IgG and C1q concentrations were also measured in seven other patients who received intravenous gammaglobulin every two weeks for 12 weeks. IgG concentrations, sputum volume, and infection scores were significantly better during intravenous treatment and there were no adverse effects from the intravenous gammaglobulin. These five patients were significantly more healthy when they received an intravenous gammaglobulin preparation, probably because the intravenous preparation increased serum IgG concentrations. Although longer studies are needed, intravenous gammaglobulin should be considered for patients with severe chest disease and those who cannot tolerate intramuscular injections.
在低丙种球蛋白血症合并慢性支气管炎患者中,对静脉注射丙种球蛋白与标准英国肌内注射制剂进行了比较。五名患者接受了为期六个月的每周一次肌内制剂治疗,并接受了为期六个月的每18天一次的静脉注射丙种球蛋白治疗。在试验期间,他们记录了感染症状、缺勤情况和痰液量;在静脉治疗期间进行了肺功能测试。还对另外七名每两周接受一次静脉注射丙种球蛋白治疗,共治疗12周的患者,测定了静脉注射IgG的半衰期以及血清IgG和C1q浓度的变化。在静脉治疗期间,IgG浓度、痰液量和感染评分明显更好,且静脉注射丙种球蛋白没有不良反应。这五名患者接受静脉注射丙种球蛋白制剂时健康状况明显更好,可能是因为静脉制剂提高了血清IgG浓度。尽管需要进行更长时间的研究,但对于患有严重胸部疾病以及不能耐受肌内注射的患者,应考虑使用静脉注射丙种球蛋白。