McManus I C, Richards P
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Nov 10;289(6454):1288-90. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6454.1288.
Analysis of shortlisting of applicants for interview at St Mary's Hospital Medical School showed that factor analysis could reduce the selection criteria to three independent scales--"academic ability," "interests," and "community service"--all of which contributed to the interview decision. Early applicants scored more highly on all three factors but were still at a greater advantage in selection for interview than would have been predicted. The dean's judgment of priority for interview from the UCCA form was found to predict a candidate's chance of acceptance at other medical schools besides St Mary's. Analysis of interviewing showed high correlations among interviewers in their assessments, although there was evidence of influence by the chairmen. Factor analysis showed three major factors--academic suitability, non-academic suitability, and health--of which non academic suitability was the major determinant of interview success. Non academic suitability was related to personality (high extraversion and low psychoticism) and to the choices made on the UCCA form. The system of admission interviews enabled greater emphasis to be put on broader interests and achievements than if selection had been on the basis of UCCA application form alone.
对圣玛丽医院医学院面试入围申请人的分析表明,因子分析可将选拔标准简化为三个独立量表——“学术能力”、“兴趣”和“社区服务”——所有这些都对面试决定有影响。早期申请人在所有三个因素上得分更高,但在面试选拔中仍比预期有更大优势。发现院长根据大学招生中央委员会(UCCA)表格对面试优先级的判断能够预测候选人被圣玛丽医院以外其他医学院录取的机会。面试分析显示,面试官的评估之间存在高度相关性,尽管有证据表明主席会产生影响。因子分析显示出三个主要因素——学术适应性、非学术适应性和健康状况——其中非学术适应性是面试成功的主要决定因素。非学术适应性与个性(高外向性和低精神质)以及在UCCA表格上做出的选择有关。与仅根据UCCA申请表进行选拔相比,入学面试系统能够更加强调更广泛的兴趣和成就。