Rowan C A, Connolly W M, Brown H S
J Environ Sci Health B. 1984 Oct;19(7):611-48. doi: 10.1080/03601238409372454.
Currently, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has established air standards for relatively few chemicals. As a result, state agencies are faced with controlling air contaminants for a large number of chemicals posing potential public health threats. Use of occupational standards as a basis for deriving ambient air guidelines is a method used by states to control air toxics. This standard development approach is reviewed by considering the differences in the health basis and numerical values which often occur among the occupational standards set by OSHA, NIOSH and ACGIH. This study indicated that careful selection should be made of the most appropriate occupational standard to use to protect public health. A comparison is made of chemicals regulated by various state air toxic programs using occupational standards lowered by a safety factor to concentrations established by the U.S. EPA. It was found that the air guidelines vary, but the degree of stringency can be comparable.
目前,美国环境保护局仅为相对较少的化学物质制定了空气标准。因此,各州机构面临着控制大量对公众健康构成潜在威胁的空气污染物的任务。将职业标准用作推导环境空气指南的基础,是各州用于控制空气有毒物质的一种方法。通过考虑职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)、国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)和美国政府工业卫生学家会议(ACGIH)制定的职业标准之间在健康依据和数值方面经常出现的差异,对这种标准制定方法进行了审查。这项研究表明,应谨慎选择最适合用于保护公众健康的职业标准。对各州各种空气有毒物质项目所管制的化学物质进行了比较,这些比较是利用将职业标准乘以安全系数后降低至美国环境保护局所确定浓度的方法进行的。结果发现,空气指南各不相同,但严格程度可能相当。