Suppr超能文献

[Diagnosis of intra-abdominal bleeding--comparison of peritoneal lavage and laparoscopy].

作者信息

Steenblock U, Dürig M

出版信息

Helv Chir Acta. 1980 Feb;46(5-6):707-10.

PMID:6447129
Abstract

By peritoneal lavage, patients with abdominal trauma can be categorizied into: I. strongly positive = frank bleeding into the abdominal cavity; II. negative = no danger of bleeding; III. only small amounts of blood staining the lavage = watching policy by repeating the peritoneal lavage. Out of 132 PL, 33 were not conclusive in the first attempt. During the course, 9 of these had to be operated upon, whereas 24 could be spared a laparotomy by our watching policy. As to accuracy, there is no doubt that peritoneal lavage is outstanding and cannot be outweighed by laparoscopy. The same is true as to rapidity. In a retrospective study concerning 100 patients with blunt abdominal trauma and intraabdominal bleeding, we found that with peritoneal lavage 75% could be diagnosed within two hours following admittance, whereas our laparoscopy team reached the same in only 26% of the patients.

摘要

相似文献

10
Diagnostic peritoneal lavage.诊断性腹腔灌洗
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982 Aug;155(2):257-64.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验