Bessman S P, Geiger P J
Science. 1981 Jan 30;211(4481):448-52. doi: 10.1126/science.6450446.
In order to explain the insulin-like effect of exercise, it was proposed in 1951 that contracting muscle fibers liberate creatine, which acts to produce an acceptor effect--later called respiratory control--on the muscle mitochondria. The development of this notion paralleled the controversy between biochemists and physiologists over the delivery of energy for muscle contraction. With the demonstration of functional compartmentation of creatine kinase on the mitochondrion, it became clear that the actual form of energy transport in the muscle fiber is phosphorylcreatine. The finding of an isoenzyme of creatine phosphokinase attached to the M-line region of the myofibril revealed the peripheral receptor for the mitochondrially generated phosphorylcreatine. This established a molecular basis for a phosphorylcreatine-creatine shuttle for energy transport in heart and skeletal muscle and provided an explanation for the inability to demonstrate experimentally a direct relation between muscle activity and the concentrations of adenosine triphosphate and adenosine diphosphate.
为了解释运动的胰岛素样作用,1951年有人提出,收缩的肌纤维会释放肌酸,肌酸作用于肌肉线粒体产生一种受体效应——后来称为呼吸控制。这一概念的发展与生物化学家和生理学家之间关于肌肉收缩能量供应的争论同时出现。随着线粒体上肌酸激酶功能区隔的证明,很明显肌肉纤维中能量运输的实际形式是磷酸肌酸。在肌原纤维的M线区域发现一种肌酸磷酸激酶同工酶,揭示了线粒体产生的磷酸肌酸的外周受体。这为心脏和骨骼肌中能量运输的磷酸肌酸-肌酸穿梭建立了分子基础,并解释了无法通过实验证明肌肉活动与三磷酸腺苷和二磷酸腺苷浓度之间的直接关系的原因。