Hall W H, Opfer B J
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 Jan;19(1):130-3. doi: 10.1128/AAC.19.1.130.
Susceptibility of pathogenic aerobic bacteria to moxalactam (LY127935) was compared by two methods, diffusion from 30-microgram disks and agar plate dilution. The two methods gave a satisfactory degree of correlation when compared by linear regression, but the slope of the linear regression was significantly steeper for gram-negative bacilli (Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) than for coccal organisms (streptococci and staphylococci). The largest zone diameters by disk diffusion were found with Citrobacter, Proteus, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, and Enterobacter strains. The error rate-bounded method of Metzler and DeHaan (J. Infect. Dis. 130:588-594, 1974) gave useful breakpoints of disk zone sizes for moxalactam resistance and susceptibility.
采用两种方法比较了致病性需氧菌对羟羧氧酰胺菌素(LY127935)的敏感性,即30微克纸片扩散法和琼脂平板稀释法。通过线性回归比较时,这两种方法具有令人满意的相关性,但革兰氏阴性杆菌(肠杆菌科和铜绿假单胞菌)的线性回归斜率比球菌(链球菌和葡萄球菌)的明显更陡。纸片扩散法测得的最大抑菌圈直径出现在柠檬酸杆菌、变形杆菌、大肠杆菌、克雷伯菌和肠杆菌菌株中。Metzler和DeHaan的误差率界定法(《传染病杂志》130:588 - 594,1974)给出了羟羧氧酰胺菌素耐药性和敏感性的纸片抑菌圈大小的有效断点。