Cochrane B J, Richmond R C
Genetics. 1980 Oct;96(2):491-506. doi: 10.1093/genetics/96.2.491.
A powerful means of studying the effects of selection on chromosome segments in Drosophila melanogaster has been described by Clegg et. al. (1976, 1978). This method utilizes a recessive lethal, dominant visible allele whose selection dynamics can be accurately modelled to predict the fates of nonlethal alleles at linked loci. Results of these experiments indicate that strong epistatic interactions among loci occur that effect fitnesses associated with gametic types in the basal region of chromosome 3. We have used similar methods in studying a different segment of chromosome 3, that spanned by Est-6 (3-36.8) and Pgm (3-43.4), with the aim of determining whether the results of Clegg and his colleagues could be reproduced when a different region was studied. Our experiment showed that selection did operate on a region of the chromosome marked by Pgm, but that no evidence of selection at loci marked by Est-6 was apparent. Weak evidence for epistatic interactions among loci within the marked region was also found. Three possible explanations for the discrepancies between our experiments and those of Clegg et al. are suggested. First, the geographically homogeneous origin of our populations may preclude selectively significant changes as a result of recombination. Second, the results seen by Clegg et al. may have been unique to the regions they studied, which included the basal heterochromatin of the chromosomes. Finally, the three loci employed may not adequately mark the unit of selection, so that actual departures from predictions of selective neutrality may not have been apparent.
克莱格等人(1976年、1978年)描述了一种研究选择对黑腹果蝇染色体片段影响的有效方法。该方法利用了一个隐性致死、显性可见等位基因,其选择动态可以被精确建模,以预测连锁位点上非致死等位基因的命运。这些实验结果表明,在第3号染色体基部区域的位点之间发生了强烈的上位相互作用,影响了与配子类型相关的适合度。我们使用了类似的方法来研究第3号染色体的另一个片段,该片段由Est-6(3-36.8)和Pgm(3-43.4)界定,目的是确定在研究不同区域时,是否能重现克莱格及其同事的结果。我们的实验表明,选择确实作用于由Pgm标记的染色体区域,但在由Est-6标记的位点上没有明显的选择证据。在标记区域内的位点之间也发现了上位相互作用的微弱证据。针对我们的实验与克莱格等人的实验之间的差异,提出了三种可能的解释。第一,我们群体在地理上的同质起源可能排除了由于重组而产生的具有选择意义的变化。第二,克莱格等人所观察到的结果可能是他们所研究区域特有的,这些区域包括染色体的基部异染色质。最后,所使用的三个位点可能没有充分标记选择单位,因此实际偏离选择中性预测的情况可能并不明显。